MiniDSP

Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Hey,
I’m slowly making progress on building some active speakers and am considering using a MiniDsp. Which of their products offers the most flexibility? One that could be used with a 2,3,or even a 4 way system? Something that allows me to experiment without having to replace the dsp when the system changes.
Thanks
 
you also can model and design with the MiniDSP, then translate the transfert function with passive elements with some online calculators like at mh-audio.com.

Or keep your MiniDSP in the low and make the mid-tweet cross-over passive.
 
I use analog inputs on both my Flex and Hypex, because I have a surround system, and the only option is to use the analog outputs from the AVR. That’s why the Flex was my choice instead of the Flex Eight. There’s also balanced outputs on the Flex, which the Eight doesn’t have.

I really like the Flex. Far better config software than the Hypex. It can also be adjusted in real time, compared to the Hypex where you need to upload a new config every time you change something. The Flex sounds very transparent to my ears. At that price tag I can’t find any better option, if at all, regardless of price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Juhazi and Jcris
I have moved on from miniDSP to CamillaDSP on a RPi

https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...ne-for-crossovers-room-correction-etc.349818/

Here is my current active crossover - https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...overs-room-correction-etc.349818/post-7213813

and here is the guide to getting it going - https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/rpi4-camilladsp-tutorial.29656/

I chose the Motu UL Mk5 for its performance and flexibility https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...u-ultralite-mk5-review-audio-interface.24777/

CamillaDSP has a good GUI, active support and works well.