Mass loaded horn?

Status
Not open for further replies.
skepticism...

I was very interested in your post because I've been playing with mass loaded horns for a while, with different Fostex drivers.

What's interesting is that most fullrangers are categorised as no-bass (or very little). The box we designed makes the fullrange driver act as a fullrange unit (meaning 20 to 20k). The bass is unlike reflex or double chamber reflex, it's incredibly tight and fast and bouncy and strong.

I'm reticent to give specifics of the enclosure right now, because it will be introduced as a commercial product early 2007. Let's say that it's pretty close to a BLH (or expanding TL), terminated by a port. The length of the horn gives maximum pressure at both ends. Bass is pumped out of the vent while there's a strong back pressure at the driver's back. The cone don't move much.

The impedance curve doesnt look like anything else, it has two sets of peaks (saddle peaks), like two reflex boxes, wich would suggest two bass peaks, but measurements showed a pretty smooth vent output.

All in all, it sounds like a BLH with a very well matched invisible sub somewhere in the room!
 
Perhaps?

Perhaps... I do not have the specifics of the design but Danley's measurements are also incredible, so that would make two sets of incredible measurements!

Similar results from dissimilar companies let me think that a lot of research can and should be done and that ultra hybrid designs can work very well indeed.
 
Don't assume mass loading is the only way forward to getting low bass. It's another tool, no more, one I like using, but I like other ways too.

Here's the projected 1/2 space response for a horn (BIB alternative) I'm developing for the FE207E. And yes, it will fit in most people's rooms. No details yet (sorry!) as I'm still working on the more detailed simulations: as you can see, the filter chamber and throat CSA needs a little work to get the response from 80-120Hz polished, but that won't take long. In-room it should be flat to about 25Hz at around 93db sensitivity, as this sim does not take into account room gain, or the effect of the reflectional boundary condition created by the floor enlarging one of the mouths.
 

Attachments

  • projected horn response.gif
    projected horn response.gif
    5.6 KB · Views: 609
No assumption.

The idea was to bring the 108 to "real" full range in a small 1.5 sq. ft tower.

Small means no horn (in the classical horn application) and 20Hz free space (anechoïc) also means no horn...

I love BL horns for the quality of the bass. The hybrid box gave me the very same bass quality, with some infrasonics for the same price. Seems like a bargain.


This is not a sim, it's the real thing in real lab conditions, and in real world listening room, it's very convincing.
 
That wasn't a remark directed toward you Robert -it was thrown out generally. I've spend most of my time with MLTLs / ML TQWTs, so I'm quite an advocate of it, as you can imagine. I'll be interested to see your finished speaker / design etc. What sort of cone displacement are we seeing at 20Hz with these BTW?
 
Hey Scottmoose, no problemo!

Displacement: none at very low frequencies. Loud and sustained electrobass notes (you know, the kind of low-low bass athmosphere on some electro-lounge tracks) are reproduced with no cone movement, so loads of back pressure on cone.

Same on warble tone 20 to 50Hz.

More displacement when enclosure is not loading driver as much, in the 100 to 200Hz, but nothing alarming (no more than same driver in BLH)

No discernable cone break up, but further laser refraction analysis will tell for sure..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.