Maplin MOSFET amp DC offset problem

Status
Not open for further replies.
I designed the PCB for Maplin Mosfet amp which is in fact modified Hitachi app note circuit. I tested it with 30V supply because it's the limit of my lab PSU. The square, sine and triangle were perfect on the scope but DC offset is -106mV on both channels. I am perplexed because I matched the input transisitors to have low offset. What could be the problem? The amp is designed for 50V supply.
 
-106mv isn't that bad when you consider the era this amp is from and the fact we attached less importance to such things.

The most obvious cause of offset in this amp is the unbalanced feedback resistor vs input resistor which is R2 and R7. The input resistor should equal the feedback value (33k). If that and the input transistors are matched then the offset should be pretty low.
 
Feedback resistor and input resistor are equal, 47k. Even gain setting resistor and series input resistors are equal, 1k. Input transistors are matched. This was the first power amp PCB I designed few months ago when I learned to use EAGLE PCB software. I know that even -106mV is tolerable but with all the measures I applied I was surprised to see the level of DC offset.
 

Attachments

  • Maplin Hitachi MOSFET amp.jpg
    Maplin Hitachi MOSFET amp.jpg
    375.3 KB · Views: 282
All you can do in this case is try different transistors in the front end and not match them so closely. You can also try altering the input resistor a little. I think increasing it will pull the offset more positive.

Maybe go back to the 33k feedback value (that is what my Maplin circuit shows) and increase R2. Perhaps the imbalance was deliberate to overcome a known design limitation. Slightly mismatched transistors should make a massive difference though.
 
Is it 30V total from V+ to V- or you used + and - 30V rails?
30V total could be to low and cause the excessive DC offset. What is the voltage difference between bases of the transistors consisting the first and the second diff pair?
 
Last edited:
chip_mk,

Lab PSU I used was at +/-30V (60Vp/p), the uper limit of my lab PSU. Since the circuit was originally designed for +/-50V, my first impression was that low supply voltage could be the culprit for high DC offset. When I test the amp with proper supply voltage I shall report if that was indeed the culprit.
 
Is it 30V total from V+ to V- or you used + and - 30V rails?
30V total could be to low and cause the excessive DC offset. What is the voltage difference between bases of the transistors consisting the first and the second diff pair?

I use the +50 - 50 voltage rails ... then I used the JLH regulated power supply module

regulated +/- 50 V rails and regulated +/- 55v rails for the power mosfets even better in my opinion

regards
 
Quiescent current is 30mA. Please check my schematic for R10 and R11. My markings are different from markings on Maplin/Hitachi schematic. I did not notice any excessive heat on the components so I guess that amp is stable. My scope is only 20MHz so it is impossible to see some very high frequency oscillation.
 

Attachments

  • Hitachi 50W.JPG
    Hitachi 50W.JPG
    65.6 KB · Views: 223
Last edited:
With this base voltage T1 should be completely turned off. And yet, both collector resistors receive similar current. Hmm...

It is the base to emitter differential that determines whether it is on or not. The base of TR1 can be grounded if desired, the DC conditions will remain correct as the emitters of the pair will be around 650 mv positive with respect to the base(s).

I remember the Winton amp. It appeared in Practical Wireless around 1980 I think at the time I was still at college and a friend built it. It was pretty good as I recall.

I wouldn't worry to much over the offset tbh, just pick a couple of transistors that get it nearer the mark... or leave it be 🙂
 
Here is the simulation of the standard amp. Remember in simulation land all devices of the same type are a perfect match to each other. See what happens when we fit disimilar devices for Q1 and Q2
 

Attachments

  • MP1.JPG
    MP1.JPG
    319.8 KB · Views: 179
  • MP2.JPG
    MP2.JPG
    319.7 KB · Views: 190
  • MP3.JPG
    MP3.JPG
    322.7 KB · Views: 179
If all parts are OK and properly connected and the PCB is correctly routed then I tend to suspect a mismatch in the current mirror consisted of D1 and T3. I would try to replace D1 with another 2SB649A with shorted collector and base (transistor turned to diode).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.