What do you understand about this article? what is it they did ?
https://hal.science/hal-02504314/document
https://hal.science/hal-02504314/document
The whole concept is to basically replace ALL iron (or as much as possible) in the entire motor structure.What I understand is that -basically- the iron centre piece of original the magnet assembly has been replaced by two ring-magnets and a plexiglass piece to hold it all in place. Also, the overhung VC has been replaced by an underhung VC. To my best of knowledge, the Purify motors also have a centrally placed magnet instead of an the classic all iron centre piece.
Maybe member Snicker-ish, very versed in motor simulation and design, will chime in.
So they remove iron BUT fill that space with some more magnet material.still made of a permanent magnet or electromagnet and iron pole pieces (top plate and T-yoke) to canalize
the magnetic flux B into the air-gap where the voice-coil moves.
why are you talking about hysteresis? in a loudspeaker the magnetic field is static. Are you referring to the moving coil?The whole concept is to basically replace ALL iron (or as much as possible) in the entire motor structure.
See summary, conclusion and Figure 1 vs Figure 2.
The idea behind this, is because iron has quite some hysteresis and nonlinearities in it (Eddy currents).
Depending on the quality and type of iron obviously. (and costs)
The main reason why using demodulation rings is a necessity for best performance.
(for frequencies roughly > 200-400Hz)
Since magnetic material and processing techniques are becoming a lot more affordable, it's an interesting thought to make the magnetic structure completely out of magnetic material.
My take on this, is that this was also the starting point of this paper.
Constructing a loudspeaker motor is always a play of compromises, so it's very interesting to see what kind of compromises one can aspect. Probably also from a patent point of view.
Another solution (or a combination of), is just adding a huge magnet, creating a lot of BL.
Which helps with getting those pesky eddy currents at bay.
It's just not very price effective and can mess up some other parameters as well.
I absolutely love the work and papers from Antonin Novak btw, they are always extremely interesting to read! 🙂
No, everything remained the same save for the magnetic circuit; no-iron magnet assembly was designed in such a way that original coil of 18 mm height became underhang. Thus VC had more area to collect much more sparse magnetic field and Bl (=sensitivity) remained the same, albeit with much smaller (1.5 vs ~6 mm) Xmax.the overhung VC has been replaced by an underhung VC
You are reading the paper wrong (well, too small illustrations doesn't help). They don't fill the space around the coil at all - from magnetic point of view, it is suspended in thin air, so nonlinearities from magnet material (NdFeB discs in this case) are irrelevant. Merit & Novak threw away any "canalization" attempt.BUT fill that space with some more magnet material
Distortion elimination. There is no high order distortions left, 2nd order is reduced by 10 to 20 dB, 3rd by 40 dB. Without any complex arrangements, half a kilo of copper in the motor or peculiar VC winding they produced possibly the most linear motor I have ever seen.I don't see the overall advantage to their plan
Go look up what eddy currents are.why are you talking about hysteresis? in a loudspeaker the magnetic field is static. Are you referring to the moving coil?
why are you talking about hysteresis? in a loudspeaker the magnetic field is static. Are you referring to the moving coil?