I'm looking to build (or better, have built) a low-pass crossover cut at around 80hz. I would like some advice on how to make it.
Thanks.
Thanks.
You will loose a lot of power, and that thing will be massive like one bass driver, try other way , active.
zoranaudio said:You will loose a lot of power, and that thing will be massive like one bass driver, try other way , active.
I'm asking which alternatives I have to NOT go active.
other way
You might look into a higher Hz cross over point and then control the output from the woofer with the Enclosure. I mean maybe 180hz with the passive components to save power and complexity in the crossover but make a box that can absorb the next 100hz your looking for. You can find info on this concept at the auto-sound web sites.
Borus
"YA but what does he know anyway"
You might look into a higher Hz cross over point and then control the output from the woofer with the Enclosure. I mean maybe 180hz with the passive components to save power and complexity in the crossover but make a box that can absorb the next 100hz your looking for. You can find info on this concept at the auto-sound web sites.
Borus
"YA but what does he know anyway"
An option to go active: http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=28300&highlight=active+crossover
Peter
Peter
Good link Peter. Several options discussed there.
And those "cheap" Behringer units do work well, especially for what they cost!
To most people, it's probably worth the price just for using the first variable lowpass crossover to use for subwoofer(s).
And those "cheap" Behringer units do work well, especially for what they cost!
To most people, it's probably worth the price just for using the first variable lowpass crossover to use for subwoofer(s).
Re: other way
I forgot to say that the speakers will be entirely Open Baffle, so I cannot and dont want to play with cabinet resonance. I will be using 2x 15" Hawrhorne Augies (or 4x 10") for 30-80/90/100 range.
I'm definitely NOT going above 100hz.
So, how big would such crossover be?
The budget would be <500€ for each.
I found this site:
http://www.apicsllc.com/apics/Misc/filter2.html
BTW, if someone can point me to some writeup of different types of crossover filters, I would be glad.
tinitus said:Bandpass cabinet...acoustic lowpass filter 😀
Borus said:You might look into a higher Hz cross over point and then control the output from the woofer with the Enclosure. I mean maybe 180hz with the passive components to save power and complexity in the crossover but make a box that can absorb the next 100hz your looking for. You can find info on this concept at the auto-sound web sites.
I forgot to say that the speakers will be entirely Open Baffle, so I cannot and dont want to play with cabinet resonance. I will be using 2x 15" Hawrhorne Augies (or 4x 10") for 30-80/90/100 range.
I'm definitely NOT going above 100hz.
So, how big would such crossover be?
The budget would be <500€ for each.
I found this site:
http://www.apicsllc.com/apics/Misc/filter2.html
BTW, if someone can point me to some writeup of different types of crossover filters, I would be glad.
Re: Re: other way
Well, to get a reasonable DCR out of an air core coil, I calculate that a 6" I.D., 13" O.D. core, 3" long wound with 350 turns of 6AWG magnet wire (assuming you can find such) would give you a ~24mH coil with a DCR of .34ohms. This would weigh 73.5 pounds and cost $440 at ~$6/lb. This would work for a 6 ohm driver in a L-R 80Hz lowpass. Interesting things happen with the resonance peak, you may want to model it....
You could use a laminate core and save 90%, but once you compromise your principles, you might as well go active 😉
Telstar said:So, how big would such crossover be?
The budget would be <500€ for each.
Well, to get a reasonable DCR out of an air core coil, I calculate that a 6" I.D., 13" O.D. core, 3" long wound with 350 turns of 6AWG magnet wire (assuming you can find such) would give you a ~24mH coil with a DCR of .34ohms. This would weigh 73.5 pounds and cost $440 at ~$6/lb. This would work for a 6 ohm driver in a L-R 80Hz lowpass. Interesting things happen with the resonance peak, you may want to model it....
You could use a laminate core and save 90%, but once you compromise your principles, you might as well go active 😉
Re: Re: Re: other way
What about using the t-bass?
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=1660762#post1660762
BTW the woofers are 8ohm.
I checked that article but it doesnt explain the differences i.e. between 1st and 3rd order crossover.
Ron E said:
Well, to get a reasonable DCR out of an air core coil, I calculate that a 6" I.D., 13" O.D. core, 3" long wound with 350 turns of 6AWG magnet wire (assuming you can find such) would give you a ~24mH coil with a DCR of .34ohms. This would weigh 73.5 pounds and cost $440 at ~$6/lb. This would work for a 6 ohm driver in a L-R 80Hz lowpass. Interesting things happen with the resonance peak, you may want to model it....
You could use a laminate core and save 90%, but once you compromise your principles, you might as well go active 😉
What about using the t-bass?
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=1660762#post1660762
BTW the woofers are 8ohm.
I checked that article but it doesnt explain the differences i.e. between 1st and 3rd order crossover.
1st order = 6dB per octave and involves 1 choke coil
3rd order = 18 dB per octave and involves two chokes and a capacitor
Trying to do this at passive level is too expensive and too lossy IMHO.
3rd order = 18 dB per octave and involves two chokes and a capacitor
Trying to do this at passive level is too expensive and too lossy IMHO.
Cal Weldon said:For the price of the passive components, you could buy a plate amp.
If I wouldn't have also to buy a preamp, it could be a viable solution.
Why not line level passive??
Rob
Nevermind. Easier using a plate amp and very nearly the same thing.
Rob🙂
Rob
Nevermind. Easier using a plate amp and very nearly the same thing.
Rob🙂
Cal Weldon said:1st order = 6dB per octave and involves 1 choke coil
3rd order = 18 dB per octave and involves two chokes and a capacitor
Trying to do this at passive level is too expensive and too lossy IMHO.
I was actually thinking of a 4th order low-pass, that wouldnt have phase problems. More or less expensive?
Robh3606 said:Why not line level passive??
Rob
Nevermind. Easier using a plate amp and very nearly the same thing.
Rob🙂
I really didnt understand the suggestion. 🙁
Did you mean a passive preamp?
Here's a link. This explains it a lot better than I can
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/filters/passiveHLxo.html
Rob🙂
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/filters/passiveHLxo.html
Rob🙂
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- low-pass crossover suggestions