Listening to Classical Music with High End Hearing Loss

Maop10.2 is an extremely good full-range driver.
You just sit and enjoy when you use them. I have them in miniOnken boxes. Constructor planet10 (dave) has managed to produce these. Can think that they beat most speakers on the market.
The drivers are matched with high precision to a pair. Which gives a razor-sharp midrange sound with a small mouth when others spread out.
That's what you have to pay extra for and it's worth every penny.
 
May I suggest the use of heavy DSP + lots of EQ and massive horns.
Instead,heavy DSP + lots of EQ and micro horns + classD amp... all together in a hearing aid capsule.
suggesting a compression driver to produce higher output at the upper end that could possibly compensate for my hearing loss

I not quite ready to go the hearing aid route, yet.

I don't think many people are enthusiastic about hearing aids, but they are likely the better/safer alternative. They have built in limiting to prevent further damage to hearing. Good ones are also far more complex than simple amplification/equalization.

Equalization of a stereo might be reasonable for mild issues, but with more extreme cases where very high output is required to compensate I would be concerned about accelerating hearing loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeifB60
There is some merit in trying to put the HF back though.
Indeed, though as long as we can hear the telephone BWs (250 - 2.5 kHz analog, 300 - 3 Khz digital) 'good enough' we can still 'feel' the missing HF BW on our faces thanks to having very complex processors (brains) to blend it together and why when I've built speech/center speakers for the seriously (workplace/age) hearing impaired I acoustically limit them to the ~250 - 3 kHz BW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: friendly1uk
Why the need to go to 10K if I can't hear much of anything above 4K? How is that extended range helping me?
Because you cant do a limit and hope that sound is good all the way to that limit. You need some margin. Even technically this makes sense. A filter set to 4k will already have started to drop a 1 dB or so and has phase variations.

All these parameters are not like brick walls - there is a soft transition band...

//
 
Maop10.2 is an extremely good full-range driver.
You just sit and enjoy when you use them. I have them in miniOnken boxes. Constructor planet10 (dave) has managed to produce these. Can think that they beat most speakers on the market.
The drivers are matched with high precision to a pair. Which gives a razor-sharp midrange sound with a small mouth when others spread out.
That's what you have to pay extra for and it's worth every penny.
I'm sure that they would sound great, but at $507 per pair I'll pass. I think I can find something that will be very satisfying for a lot less.
 
I think we are really on the same page. When I was referring to a 5 to 6" full range that was with regard to the overall frame diameter. Those typically have an actual cone diameter of something like 3.5".
Yes.. I used the word 'about' to indicate this. If you really want to know the breakup details for a particular driver you can look at polar measurements.
 
Because you cant do a limit and hope that sound is good all the way to that limit. You need some margin. Even technically this makes sense. A filter set to 4k will already have started to drop a 1 dB or so and has phase variations.

All these parameters are not like brick walls - there is a soft transition band...

//
We are not talking about a filter with a roll off. We are talking about the actual frequency response curve of the driver. And for many of these small full range drivers the FR is very flat out to about 4K. So, if my hearing drops off very rapidly above 4K, which it does, why do I need speakers that extend into that area?
 
That's not quite the issue. I listen alone.

The problem is that my high end roll off is so steep that to boost it enough to compensate I would likely be blasting the sound into the rest of the house and annoying my wife. I'm not sure I can even compensate enough for it anyhow.
 
I don't think many people are enthusiastic about hearing aids, but they are likely the better/safer alternative. They have built in limiting to prevent further damage to hearing. Good ones are also far more complex than simple amplification/equalization.

Equalization of a stereo might be reasonable for mild issues, but with more extreme cases where very high output is required to compensate I would be concerned about accelerating hearing loss.

Well, I can only add my own personal experience to this.
I listen mostly to classical music and have had hearing issues most of my life. I tended to always feel like the OP, that I was not missing much.
And then earlier this year I got hearing aids.
The biggest improvement to my hearing with the hearing aids has been with listening to music, both recorded and live in concert.
I recently attended my first Melbourne Symphony concert since I got the hearing aids, I was just amazed at the sound of the orchestra now.
 
Good input and glad to know that you were able to enjoy the concert better with the hearing aids.

I'm really trying to address a somewhat different matter. Namely, whether a full range driver would be preferable to a 2-way speaker below about 5 KHz.

The full range would get rid of any crossover introduced issues, particularly with regard to coherence. Although there seems to be various opinions as to whether coherence is a real issue or not.
 
Last edited:
The larger issue is that you cannot hear very well, even though you of course hear everything that you are able to hear.
Making compromises to accommodate that leads to more and more compromises down the road that rarely satisfy. It can be never ending.
But it is your choice.
 
My point of introducing deliberately a lift >2k by the means of a CD (argh!) is the same operated by any device that needs to repair/replace the loss.
Probably it re-synthesizes the higher harmonics into the wave form, somehow...
But manipulations inside the ear channel are not my interest, so I suggested what I experimented...it costs 100$ instead of 8000$ and operates in large environment i.e. rooms, patios ...🙂
 
Last edited:
Well, I can only add my own personal experience to this.
I listen mostly to classical music and have had hearing issues most of my life. I tended to always feel like the OP, that I was not missing much.
And then earlier this year I got hearing aids.
The biggest improvement to my hearing with the hearing aids has been with listening to music, both recorded and live in concert.
I recently attended my first Melbourne Symphony concert since I got the hearing aids, I was just amazed at the sound of the orchestra now.

I've thought about that... High End DIY hearing aids...

A backpack battery, a hat with a couple of FET boards on top and a few LEDs.

Blue of course.
 
Good input and glad to know that you were able to enjoy the concert better with the hearing aids.

I'm really trying to address a somewhat different matter. Namely, whether a full range driver would be preferable to a 2-way speaker below about 5 KHz.

The full range would get rid of any crossover introduced issues, particularly with regard to coherence. Although there seems to be various opinions as to whether coherence is a real issue or not.

What exactly is your budget?

It's hard to give you an answer... someone gave you one but you felt it was too expensive... so....

I think the issue with a single full range speaker is that full orchestral music has a lot of bass energy and you need something that can swing with that.

BTW, do you miss the shimmering of the brass instruments? Cymbals?