Hy.
I want to make this kind of crossover to connect a 12" sub and two sattelites (8" mid + TW) to the power amp.
All the speakers are 8 ohm.
Now. . . i would like the crossover to cut at 150 Hz. The sub must play what's under 150 Hz and the sattelites the rest.
What values would you recommend me for C and L in this case.
I have 64uF and 1.7 mH. Are these values right ?
Do you know a better method to connect these speakers to a stereo power amp ?
Thanks,
I want to make this kind of crossover to connect a 12" sub and two sattelites (8" mid + TW) to the power amp.
All the speakers are 8 ohm.
Now. . . i would like the crossover to cut at 150 Hz. The sub must play what's under 150 Hz and the sattelites the rest.
What values would you recommend me for C and L in this case.
I have 64uF and 1.7 mH. Are these values right ?
Do you know a better method to connect these speakers to a stereo power amp ?
Thanks,
Attachments
Hi,
your schematic can not work; sub play only diference between L and R channel, Left MTW is out of phase.
Regards
your schematic can not work; sub play only diference between L and R channel, Left MTW is out of phase.
Regards
Ok, thanks
Now how can i still connect a subwoofer and two sattelites to a stereo amp ?
A link, a schematic something ?
Regards,
Now how can i still connect a subwoofer and two sattelites to a stereo amp ?
A link, a schematic something ?
Regards,
Hi Ford
I have never seen a passive crossover that will sum the bass from two channels .
Your options are to buy a dual voice coil sub driver, and use a circuit similar to the one below, (this crosses over 1st order 100Hz, and I would not recommend going higher for a single sub), or go active and build a PLLXO from Planet 10's site and get another amp.
I have never seen a passive crossover that will sum the bass from two channels .
Your options are to buy a dual voice coil sub driver, and use a circuit similar to the one below, (this crosses over 1st order 100Hz, and I would not recommend going higher for a single sub), or go active and build a PLLXO from Planet 10's site and get another amp.
Attachments
Simple:
Just do this;
1- in one chanel, insert a inverter before the input of the amplifier, using a simple opamp.
2- in the output if this channel, invert the polarity of the speaker.
Here you have the 'magic of this':
connect the sub to the + outputs of both channels.
You can still use the crossovers you design.
😎 😎 😎
Any comments from moamps and pinkmouse? 😉 😉
This is a simple configuration of car audio amplifiers 🙄
Pedro Martins
Just do this;
1- in one chanel, insert a inverter before the input of the amplifier, using a simple opamp.
2- in the output if this channel, invert the polarity of the speaker.
Here you have the 'magic of this':
connect the sub to the + outputs of both channels.
You can still use the crossovers you design.
😎 😎 😎
Any comments from moamps and pinkmouse? 😉 😉
This is a simple configuration of car audio amplifiers 🙄
Pedro Martins
audioPT said:
Any comments from moamps and pinkmouse? 😉 😉
Hi, Pedro
Idea is OK. But, if somebody has knowledge to install inverter between preamp and amp, I think that better idea is implementation active sub.
In passive combination anyway you have big work to do; from huge choke for sub and rest of world to adjustment levels between. Simplest way is active.IMHO
Regards
moamps said:Idea is OK. But, if somebody has knowledge to install inverter between preamp and amp, I think that better idea is implementation active sub.
In passive combination anyway you have big work to do; from huge choke for sub and rest of world to adjustment levels between. Simplest way is active.
Seconded😉
Of course active is the best way.
But I'm only thinking in low cost for Ford_V6😉
The implementation of an opamp it's very easy, right?
If cost isn't important, go active!
Regards
Pedro Martins
But I'm only thinking in low cost for Ford_V6😉
The implementation of an opamp it's very easy, right?
If cost isn't important, go active!
Regards
Pedro Martins
Ok
Thanks, i will go active.
I was thinking in using a bridge configuration of the TDA7294 for the power stage.
Or is better a discrete amp ?
What do you think ?
Thanks, i will go active.
I was thinking in using a bridge configuration of the TDA7294 for the power stage.
Or is better a discrete amp ?
What do you think ?
Hi,
bridged TDA7294 work very good in subs (with appropriate heatsink), but nominal impedance of speaker can not be smaller then 8ohms.
Regards
bridged TDA7294 work very good in subs (with appropriate heatsink), but nominal impedance of speaker can not be smaller then 8ohms.
Regards
Ford_V6 said:I want to drive a 12" 8 ohm subwoofer.
Is better to brigde two TDA7293V than brigde the 7294 ?
Hi,
I prefer TDA7293.
Regards
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Left - SubWoofer - Right Crossover