Killer I/V opamp

Status
Not open for further replies.
OPA627 is one of my favorite. However, I don't like it that much for I/V conversion because of it's BB laid-back sound (slightly coloued, IMO). LT1469's sound is as clean as OPA627's (That's quite an achivement), but is quieter and more neutral (is there such a thing as More Neutral). For the final audio output, LT1469 may lack output urrent (20ma) and some character. That's why I am using OPA627s there in the same CD player.

AD811 -- haven't compared yet.

I just put LT1364 in the I/V stage and sound became somewhat muddy and busy (read: noisy). It's another excellent opamp, IMO, with superb specs and decent price. However, for I/V conversion, LT1469 is a much better choice.
 
I do not completely understand your question. I am talking ahout a commercial cd player that has an I/V stage. I am just swapping the opamps -- no need for a daughter board or to hard wiring, just sockets.

If you are talking about single vs dual opamps, yes, for OPA627s, I used the Browndog adapters, since the original position was for two dual opamps.
 
The AD844 makes a very good I/V converter, and was used in a number of Sonic Frontiers dacs. It's a single op-amp, note that it is a current amplifier designed specifically for I/V conversion so I would recommend alternate devices for the none I/V (lpf stage usually) stages.
 
Tried 1469....

Samples from Linear came in today, i am using my modified MSB link i/v stage.

I have to say 1364 sounds much better...1469 sounds almost muted in comparism. Implementation wise, i have more than adequate bypassing, perhaps its not optimal for the 1469. But my growing collection of opamps dictate i am not going to change my config for one pair of opamps.

Chuck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.