This seems to be along the lines I have thought about because every time I can lower THD, it gets more accurate sounding. As I suggested earlier, we may be measuring ultra low THD changes but that is not necessarily the level of distortion which is heard when music is played.There is nothing remarkable about the result that I know of. No doubt it would make perfect sense if more measurements were conducted to measure the change in IMD using my same listening levels.
The result only seems significant in one way: People who claim that they hear distortion in a system with measured HD down around -120dB are not necessarily crazy.
From the perspective of overall system design I think its a problem in that we don't have way to gainstage our systems dynamically depending on how they are used at a particular time. In my case, the system only ever briefly gets turned up to anywhere near 0dBFS to impress guests. Otherwise, I prefer to listen at rather low levels.
It might be worth mentioning as an aside (and for billshurv) that hearing, IME is not entirely linear. Distortion of a music signal is not heard as separate signal -120dB (or other level) below whatever is being listened to. It is heard/perceived as an alteration integral to music being listen to, and I am not aware of any research showing evidence to the contrary. If there is some, I would be very interested to see it.
Thus I showed this data. We can measure THD to very low levels but may be hearing other things related to IMD.
We maybe measuring way down there but hearing something way up here. 🙂 Scientific speak.

THx-RNMarsh
There's a lot of good stuff in here, between the goop and bybees... JN's speaker ideas, Pavel's tests... many more!
And for an uplifting break, look into BBC2's the Repair Shop on iPlayer... It's a great program. Tonight's included restoration of a Portuguese Guitar...
And for an uplifting break, look into BBC2's the Repair Shop on iPlayer... It's a great program. Tonight's included restoration of a Portuguese Guitar...
Forget that - what did you find at Chomsky's open house?
😛
It was Skinner's and after a little research he was actually the house near by 11 Dee Road, I must have misunderstood the realtor. Checking Google maps the Corbusier house we looked at is still there, hard to believe since it needed a lot of work and was strange.
I did know one of Chomsky's proteges, one of the few people who had their tenure revoked at MIT for passing joints in class.
Last edited:
@Mark: If you can put together a DAC where the registers can be changed and check that you can hear this difference with that exact board (and note the settings and music used) then we have a starting point.
The challenge then is agreeing what needs to be measured and how. That is where I would have to defer to those more experienced in the art.
The challenge then is agreeing what needs to be measured and how. That is where I would have to defer to those more experienced in the art.
If you agree to expand on these details, then I would agree to expand on the Dead Milkmen CP.
Speaking of cows my fav Steve Albini incarnation is Big Black. He was fond of wearing a Die Kreuzen t-shirt.
Attachments
@Mark: If you can put together a DAC where the registers can be changed and check that you can hear this difference with that exact board (and note the settings and music used) then we have a starting point.
The challenge then is agreeing what needs to be measured and how. That is where I would have to defer to those more experienced in the art.
I vote the direction of, "(insert personality here) is going to say what (insert personality here) is going to say". It's not like new ground is getting covered.
Skinner Boxes everywhereForget that - what did you find at Chomsky's open house?
Speaking of cows my fav Steve Albini incarnation is Big Black. He was fond of wearing a Die Kreuzen t-shirt.
Yes, "Songs About *******" was one of my favorite albums at the time. Milwaukee had lots of punk/alt/shoegazing bands. BTW, <PIG> is coming back to town.
I vote the direction of, "(insert personality here) is going to say what (insert personality here) is going to say". It's not like new ground is getting covered.
Maybe but I still retain some optimism despite being a cynical old git most of the time.
Forget that - what did you find at Chomsky's open house?
Chimpsky?
Yes, "Songs About *******" was one of my favorite albums at the time.
I nearly fell off my chair when Anthony Bourdain looked Steve up on lunch recommendations in Chicago flashing that album cover on screen in the process.
Heard about it before .
As an undergraduate, I worked in the electronics shop in the Psych Dep't at Columbia during the time of Nim Chimpsky. Whereas Prof. Terrace always called the chimp "Nim," pretty much everyone else called him "Herbie" (not in Terrace's presence, of course)
I think they are both consistent. Here's what I know from experimentation, Sabre dacs have HD compensation for 2nd and 3rd harmonics. ESS claims THD of -120dB is possible, and I am able to show all harmonics below -120dBFS using 1kHz test tone.
I think very, very special people may hear 0.05% distortion if it is mainly higher order harmonics. For the rest of us its probably 3 -5 times higher than that.
I seriously doubt anyone can hear anything at -80dB below the fundamental.
Disagree with me?
DBT it please and show the numbers.
DBT it please and show the numbers.
Popcorn is in the microwave, waiting for mmerrill and Jakob(x) to jump in.
And for an uplifting break, look into BBC2's the Repair Shop on iPlayer... It's a great program. Tonight's included restoration of a Portuguese Guitar...
can't stop watching it!! I'm just waiting for someone to bring a vintage piece of audio gear..
"I think they are both consistent. Here's what I know from experimentation, Sabre dacs have HD compensation for 2nd and 3rd harmonics. ESS claims THD of -120dB is possible, and I am able to show all harmonics below -120dBFS using 1kHz test tone. "
I think very, very special people may hear 0.05% distortion if it is mainly higher order harmonics. For the rest of us its probably 3 -5 times higher than that.
I seriously doubt anyone can hear anything at -80dB below the fundamental.
Disagree with me?
DBT it please and show the numbers.
I don't know about -120dB but I see -90dB being perceived in this ABX
Jitter Correlation to Audibility | Page 12 | Headphone Reviews and Discussion - Head-Fi.org
Like Mark says, it's the quality of the sound that's affected, not a distinct sound at -90dB - this guy says "Still using the same cue, quality of the piano attack in soft passages, but there's less of it here"
With analysis of the files being used this is stated "That is a really excellent result, the difference between the files is always less than -90.3 dBFS (= 1 LSB in 16-bit resolution), except for a low level "click" at the end of the file, and only rarely has peaks above -96 dBFS."
How on earth do you think anyone can evaluate a dac when they themselves provide an unknown power source and output stage?
//
//
The exact dac I used is too large to ship. I could provide a dac board with the same dac chip, a USB board to feed it I2S, and an Arduino with code to program it. The experimenter would need to provide +-15v, +5v, power supplies, and would probably need to fashion a 3-opamp output stage for which a schematic could be provided. I do have a reasonably low distortion discrete output stage I could send, but don't know if its distortion can go as low as a good OPA1612 output stage (I would suspect not). If someone were serious about doing it, it would probably take me a few days to collect everything together and draw up an interconnection diagram.
EDIT: Alternatively, I could order an Iancanada output stage board and then send it combined with a different dac board. Distortion should be low enough and it should simpler to work with than the other option described above.
Disagree with me?
Don't know. Don't listen to fixed sine waves, nor HD in particular. Do listen for IMD. That takes more than one fundamental.
However, if its any calibration point for you, it is completely non-controversial that if audio CDs are not dithered, there will be some people that can hear the resulting quantizing noise/distortion. Since CDs are 16-bits and each bit is worth 6-dB of dynamic range, that puts the truncation effects at down around -96dBFS.
How on earth do you think anyone can evaluate a dac when they themselves provide an unknown power source and output stage?
//
I would be happy to discuss the particulars with anyone interested in volunteering to do the work.
Don't know. Don't listen to fixed sine waves, nor HD in particular. Do listen for IMD. That takes more than one fundamental.
Inquiring minds want to know: how do I "listen for IMD"? I can only listen, you know, like in listening.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III