^^^^
Try as you might, it may not go well. It's pretty easy to get comb filtering, or boundary reinforcement issues.
that is why you do near-field listening. … to minimize/reduce this.
THx-RNMarsh
I don't know the SPL exactly, but I can say that Richard seems to like to listen at higher SPL than I normally do. 🙂
http://www.soundadvice.info/thewholestory/san12.htm
-RM
that is why you do near-field listening. … to minimize/reduce this.
THx-RNMarsh
Actually I was refering to near field. Speakers closer than 6ft to each other are always problematic. If they had some improved controlled directivity it would make it more managaeble.
There are also some concerns with lobbing affect, where you can get disportionate response from some speakers, and may need to raise them. Smaller drivers pushing into the bass can have slightly awkward power response shapes really close to the speaker as well; which is also part of the crossover design. They are partially dependent on the nautrual expansion of the wave as it travels.
Anyways, I have read good things about the LS50 as a nearfield monitor. But IMO they don't do bass too well, even for the FR they have. Probably over damped.
No, I have not.
I sent you two bigger emails recently. If you are just not replying, ok, but maybe your email service is problematic?
It depends where you are measuring it. EQing a driver flat can actually reduce distortion due to ringing for example.
Yes, at the speaker can work great. But it was a craze for awhile, trying to EQ at the listener position.
What has an article on the SPL in the middle of the orchestra pit have to do with domestic reproduction of recorded music?
What has an article on the SPL in the middle of the orchestra pit have to do with domestic reproduction of recorded music?
you are free to pick your location to measure.
Front row or mid row. ?
-RM
Maybe it's how he became deaf 😀
and all musicians in the orchatra and the maestro are all totally deaf also.
-RM
Last edited:
Anyways, I have read good things about the LS50 as a nearfield monitor. But IMO they don't do bass too well, even for the FR they have. Probably over damped.
There are many accurate and specifically developed for near-field monitor speakers ---- an accurate one that some call the Gold Standard is the ADAM A7x ($750 ea.)
or these --https://www.jbl.com/studio-monitors/
Dynaudio MB5
Neumann KH 120A
-RM
Last edited:
Nothing in that article that has a measurement for front row.
BTW why the pushing of commercial speaker designs? I thought this was DIY? You in the right place 😛
BTW why the pushing of commercial speaker designs? I thought this was DIY? You in the right place 😛
Last edited:
I see why you quote who you are replying to, so they can't add words after you've replied to them as you have done above by needlessly adding the word "totally" after I replied 😛and all musicians in the orchatra and the maestro are all totally deaf also.
-RM
Possibly Richard is referring to a well regarded commercial speaker that can be found in other countries and cities so you have a common reference if one bothered to go out and hear it, a DIY speaker would only be heard by a few, the rest of us wouldn’t know how it sounded.
I see why you quote who you are replying to, so they can't add words after you've replied to them as you have done above by needlessly adding the word "totally" after I replied 😛
yep. exaggeration gets attention.
By many persons opinions, they should be totally deaf by now as they are closer than we are to the levels shown. yet, they hear fine.
I hear fine also.
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
Nothing in that article that has a measurement for front row.
BTW why the pushing of commercial speaker designs? I thought this was DIY? You in the right place 😛
you can google and find front row if you like to know that number.
How loud, in SPL, is fff from a large orchestra at front row distance?
see #5096
any more questions or contributions on CD or near field or lower distortion from drivers?
-RM
Last edited:
Which again has nothing to do with domestic reproduction as commercial recordings employ considerable fader riding. Hand held readings with a ratshack meter which is known to be seriously off are also hardly credible. Do you really believe everything you read on the internet without question?
Ed I am sure has some proper measurements with calibrated gear, but still has no bearing on what gets recorded, mastered and released for us to replay.
Ed I am sure has some proper measurements with calibrated gear, but still has no bearing on what gets recorded, mastered and released for us to replay.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III