https://www.dibirama.it/altoparlant...1-1-1/sica-lp90-28-n92-tw-z009160-detail.html
When you go to dibirama shop, the description of the tweeter as great.
BTW just yesterday I ordered a pair of those.
I've heard some very very good feedback about those and I would like to try them. (donhighend and Loudspeaker pad users)
If someone wants to see something interesting at dibirama measurements, take a look at the distortion plots of monacor msh 116.
And compare those distortion plots to satori midrange, textreme or anything else you want.
When you go to dibirama shop, the description of the tweeter as great.
BTW just yesterday I ordered a pair of those.
I've heard some very very good feedback about those and I would like to try them. (donhighend and Loudspeaker pad users)
If someone wants to see something interesting at dibirama measurements, take a look at the distortion plots of monacor msh 116.
And compare those distortion plots to satori midrange, textreme or anything else you want.
The Dibrama distortion measurements are shown in a way far from practical useflulness. The Sica tweeter in question is beyond reproach everywhere I have seen it tested, especially in terms of its level stability.
Thats kind of a silly scart wrt to scales. Y-axis go to 20Hz - for a tweeter its of no importance. The y-axis go 25% which is a figure no one is interested in. Speaker drives these days do < 0,1% - so an axis of max say 3% and and resolution to really see whats going on between 0,01 and 1% would be more interesting. The above just looks like something was intended to be hidden and don't give the issuer and credit whatsoever. Seeing such a presentation makes me immediately disqualify the product - or at least the organisation that made the measurement.
//