Is there any better OP than OPA2134

Status
Not open for further replies.
AD797

Hi.
It's a fet input device. If this is not important to you the AD797 is a better opamp in many applications. The device is well documented on Analog Device's website. Compare the specs and see what you are looking for.
In my opinion AD797 sounds better.

Atle.
 
Some duals that may be interesting and that are available in DIL packages at Elfa.

EL2244
OPA2604
OP275
LM6172

Maybe some of the won't work well in your application. Some are JFET in, other bipolar. The 6172 is very fast and may cause oscillation problems.
 
Maybe I should have added that my list was not meant as a suggestion of the kind that all those op amps are necessarily better. However, for each of them, there are people who have tried it and consider that particular one to be the best of all op amps. But I could suggest almost any op amp (except for 741 maybe) and there will be somebody who says it sounds awful and somebody who thinks it sounds marvellous. So, from those op amps that people recommend from time to time, I just picked those that fit the availability criteria in this case. The application will naturally also affect which op amp may be the best choice, but unless I missed it, there was no info on the application.
 
Christer said:


And it is not dual, which seemed to be a requirement.


Why?
I at least don't see in clear text that "requirement".

Can't we use dual single's instead of single dual?

Do we want just below -80 dB crosstalk for instance as the suggested OP-AMP Upupa gave if each OP-AMP in/on same package/die is going to work with 2 ch information, eg. stereo?

In that case any OP-AMP with -100 dB noise flor/PSRR/distortion etc. is a "waste", yes/no?

Cheers Michael
 
Ultima Thule said:

Why?
I at least don't see in clear text that "requirement".

Can't we use dual single's instead of single dual?


The AD797 was dismissed for not being a dual earlier, so I assumed it had to be a dual. If that is not required, the situation is quite different. We also still don't know what it will be used for, do we?
 
Christer said:


The AD797 was dismissed for not being a dual earlier, so I assumed it had to be a dual. If that is not required, the situation is quite different. We also still don't know what it will be used for, do we?


Maybe you should adress your post to Upupa!? 😉

Cheers Michael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.