This thread split from here http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=134719
zox2003 Sometimes it is necessary to specify the author PCB
zox2003 Sometimes it is necessary to specify the author PCB
Hi people,
Not knowing anything of the original design, the IR application design, both of these may come from the same layout. It's possible the changes were suggested in the text as well.
This would be "prior art" and also "prior artwork"!
So before everyone starts finger pointing and squawking, why not examine the original artwork and circuit? From there we can get a pretty good idea who did what.
So people, let's see the progression from IR's artwork before any more talk on who did what first.
-Chris
Not knowing anything of the original design, the IR application design, both of these may come from the same layout. It's possible the changes were suggested in the text as well.
This would be "prior art" and also "prior artwork"!
So before everyone starts finger pointing and squawking, why not examine the original artwork and circuit? From there we can get a pretty good idea who did what.
So people, let's see the progression from IR's artwork before any more talk on who did what first.
-Chris
zox2003 - seems like you've stolen this idea
not really nice of you m8...
Infringement of copyrights is a crime. In ancient Rome for it a hand cut off...
It is only infringement if he tries to sell boards without the original artwork creator permission.
If you are using someone elses work, either whole or as a starting point it is common courtesy to aknowledge that.
dave
anatech said:Not knowing anything of the original design, the IR application design, both of these may come from the same layout.
Except for similarities based on the common functionality, these boards don't look the same to me. Attached is a side by side, artwork scaled based on the common chip.
dave
Attachments
re
You always learn that that you did? I always learn. It is not a pity to me, let do, use on the discretion, but specify that whose idea it is used, it is impossible to speak "I long did"...
zox2003 has not understood that it UcD technology, not IR...
sorry my english ...
You always learn that that you did? I always learn. It is not a pity to me, let do, use on the discretion, but specify that whose idea it is used, it is impossible to speak "I long did"...
zox2003 has not understood that it UcD technology, not IR...
sorry my english ...
demon_lee said:I want that all knew, the author of this PCB - witaly
+1 I confirm.
http://www.vegalab.ru/forum/showpost.php?p=501448&postcount=3241
Eva said:The layouts look almost exactly the same, with some tantalum chip SMD capacitors replaced by radial through-hole electrolytics as the only difference.
The similarity is clearly not incidental. One layout was obviously copied from the other.
I'm with you Eva... xDDD
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Class D
- IRS2092 amplifier up and running