Presented frequency response measurements are very hard to read, almost unusable. Please use smoothing (1/12 or 1/6 octave) in your measurements of frequency response.
I find it easier to see the peaks and dips clearly without smoothing.
Yes, picks and dips are slightly averaged, but overall trend is much clearer with 1/12 octave smoothing. Thanks!
Different measurements systems use different smoothing algorithms, so somewhere 1/12 octave smoothing is not enough. But here is obvious that 1/6 octave is too much smoothing, so it obscures picks and dips. In my Audiomatica CLIO 12 using 1/12 octave smoothing makes perfect compromise.
Which measuring system are you using? Is your system supporting 1/24 octave smoothing? Seems to me it would be better compromise between 1/12 and without smoothing.
Different measurements systems use different smoothing algorithms, so somewhere 1/12 octave smoothing is not enough. But here is obvious that 1/6 octave is too much smoothing, so it obscures picks and dips. In my Audiomatica CLIO 12 using 1/12 octave smoothing makes perfect compromise.
Which measuring system are you using? Is your system supporting 1/24 octave smoothing? Seems to me it would be better compromise between 1/12 and without smoothing.
Last edited:
Hi Sonce.
I use "My Speaker (japanese version)" software, which is close to my hearing.
The microphone is the one that comes with "OmniMic".
I use "My Speaker (japanese version)" software, which is close to my hearing.
The microphone is the one that comes with "OmniMic".