Exhibit A: https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor.273524/post-4306110
Code:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachments/full-range/828413d1585383617-10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor-b80-rs225-fast-build-finished-04-jpg
Exhibit A above references missing images. I'm on the hunt for "broken links" now - any examples where a link to the old site no longer links to this site (at all or incorrectly)? Please tag me ASAP you find one of those.
I have found an earlier report of google search revealing links that the user reported as broken. I have subsequently verified that that same search works for me - so possibly google has updated its cache but that doesn't mean every incoming link site will have done so.
A couple of solid and verifiable examples will really help here.
I have found an earlier report of google search revealing links that the user reported as broken. I have subsequently verified that that same search works for me - so possibly google has updated its cache but that doesn't mean every incoming link site will have done so.
A couple of solid and verifiable examples will really help here.
Start with the very first post -- just try to read/follow it -- and any other posts on this page that contain images.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor.273524/
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor.273524/
This link is broken and leds to the last page of the thread instead of the required post: https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/273524-10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor-334.html
Interesting, thanks for the example. Looks like the image links got rewritten or truncated.
@xrk971 Where these gallery images? Links to attached images? Do you remember?
Typically, these images are in found later on in the same thread. Sometimes posted in anothe thread.
For example, the first broken link is:
802945d1576612905-10f-rs225-fast-speaker-xo-pcb-gb-10f-rs225-speaker-system-photo-jpg
I believe the image referenced came from here::
:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor.273524/post-5789339
Edit: I just tried to look for this thread on the wayback machine to see if I could find stuff. The wayback machine said it could not find the present URL for this thread:
"https://www.diyaudio.com/[/URL]community/threads/10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor.273524/"
But, I searched a link to this thread in my shop, and it shows this:
"http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/273524-10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-ref-monitor.html"
And indeed, on the wayback machine, this thread shows up when using theold URL, and has been around since 2015 and uploaded to wayback 42 times.
It appears that the migration was used as an opportunity to change the site's architecture or directory structure en-masse, renaming "/forums/full-range/" into "/community/threads/" and appending .273524 to the end of the URL.
I believe a temporary solution to this might be to restore and place online, a legacy static website using the identical root tree structure as the old website, and this will allow those links to find their content.
Last edited:
Thanks. That’s what it looked like. This is one for the boys in the engine room. I believe Jason is looking into it.
Good work, can you also give me a link to the correct post so I can give both to the dev team, Thanks?This link is broken and leds to the last page of the thread instead of the required post: https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/273524-10f-8424-rs225-8-fast-waw-ref-monitor-334.html
Plenty of broken images here:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/cfh7-amp.294834/Other than that the new site is very pleasant.
Cheers,
Jacques
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/cfh7-amp.294834/Other than that the new site is very pleasant.
Cheers,
Jacques
Umm... nothing pleasant without functionality. As XRK mentioned elsewhere, saving images on a forum's server is considered safer & better for longevity than saving them elsewhere, but it appears that a majority of the images that work here now are hosted elsewhere.Other than that the new site is very pleasant.
Hey guys. I have split the discussions about this very specific case of mangled image URLs into its own ticket.
We are currently investigating this issue.
EDIT UPDATE: We're narrowing down on this, hope to have a fix up within 24 hours.
We are currently investigating this issue.
EDIT UPDATE: We're narrowing down on this, hope to have a fix up within 24 hours.
Last edited:
If you have time, please tell us the technical reasons for the mangled link and how it was globally fixed? Just a technical curiosity.
Sure thing. That particular attachment link structure could have been from any of the following incarnations of link structure that we've had over the last 20+ years:
Whatever link structure it was, our development partners (who are XenForo experts) had never seen it before, so it wasn't planned for or easily recognizable. After some detective work, we resolved it with an NginX regular expression rewrite rule to strip out the attachment id and rewrite the URLs to the new attachment URL structure.
- Around 2001 we started using vBulletin version 2
- Around 2010 we moved to vBulletin version 3
- Around 2014 we started using vB SEO which preferred search engine friendly links
- Around 2018 we migrated to dB SEO because vB SEO was now unsupported and had lots of security risks
Whatever link structure it was, our development partners (who are XenForo experts) had never seen it before, so it wasn't planned for or easily recognizable. After some detective work, we resolved it with an NginX regular expression rewrite rule to strip out the attachment id and rewrite the URLs to the new attachment URL structure.
- Home
- Site
- Forum Problems & Feedback
- Resolved - Bug Squashed Inline images referencing an old version of attachment URLs are not working