Impedance Match Question

You are right. The input impedance of the loopback input(motu’s Microphone XLR input has a input impedance of 2.8k ohm). So the attenuation should be ((2.8/3.8)+1.2+1.2)/(2.8/3.8) , which is about 3.52. That is 12.58dB attenuation.
 
Like people discovered long time ago, a variable attenuator is a must.
That's right. I'm just trying to attenuate using analog pad when possible, getting a slightly better noise level comparing to digital attenuation. I would have attenuate everything through an analog pot, but I have 8 channels and two sets of amps with different gain, so I wanted to use u-pad to attenuate the amps of different gains and then control the volume of all 8 channels digitally with a remote control. I know that analog volume control is still better, but 8 channel analog volume control that beats digital attenuation is hard to find. And I don't think I'm knowledgable enough to build somethign like a Muses 72323 yet.

I did a loopback sanity check with motu soundcard. Although the ressitors I use are crappy film resistors, but I guess the result is reasonably good?
 

Attachments

  • analog-pad.jpg
    analog-pad.jpg
    93 KB · Views: 66
  • digital-12dB.jpg
    digital-12dB.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 64
  • loopback.jpg
    loopback.jpg
    92.7 KB · Views: 60
A newbie question about matching impedance in general: Why in electronic and radiofrequencies we need to match impedance, output Z = input Z otherwise the signal makes an echo
While in audio we are looking for lower output Z and higher input Z? There is not echo in audio signal? Thank you