I don't believe cables make a difference, any input?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are getting into the wrong business with that attitude. Free! :no:
Cable sales are not about giving the good stuff away. Get with the program man. 🙂

So your saying i should charge people to have their cables broken in, why, ? i could just throw it on this gimic and tell them they have to wait a week.

I'm not trying to become rich like the other companies do.!
 
So your saying i should charge people to have their cables broken in, why, ?

If you don't charge for something, people don't value it. If you charge a LOT and concoct an entertaining tale, you might find it to be profitable. Works for all sorts of quack devices and therapies. If you play your cards right, eventually you'll have a coterie of internet goons who will descend en masse on anyone who dares to question and smother him with gobs of ignorant indignation.

Beats working for a living.
 
If you don't charge for something, people don't value it. If you charge a LOT and concoct an entertaining tale, you might find it to be profitable. Works for all sorts of quack devices and therapies. If you play your cards right, eventually you'll have a coterie of internet goons who will descend en masse on anyone who dares to question and smother him with gobs of ignorant indignation.

Beats working for a living.

Good point sy, I do love working for a living 🙂 I could charge for it, but charge a smaller fee. The point of my journey is to sell cables have fun doing it and make enough to buy supply's to keep doing it.
 
The end connectors are bio-mechanical and adapt it's molecular structure to "fuse" itself to the jack, creating the ultimate fit, in fact an unbroken connector with no mating surfaces. The connector responds to a concentrated omega beam which triggers it's release.


two-timer-small-black.jpg
 
Why is that a shame? Some work and beliefs deserve criticism. Or do you believe that everything is valid, nothing is wrong, and all ideas, regardless of their conformance with physics and their lack of supporting evidence deserve to be taken seriously? If that's so, may I introduce you to the perpetual motion community?
 
For those of you who think that the audio crowd are the only ones who have trouble with DBTs, here is a good read. 🙂

A Hint of Hype, A Taste of Illusion in the Wall Street Journal.

.

If someone wants to read the article mentioned above, it was this one:

http://www.wine-economics.org/journ...ine economics_Robert T. Hodgson (105-113).pdf


Really interesting to read, but it´s not an argumentation against dbts but a strong reminder that carefully selected controls have to be used to provide useful results.
Basically controls serve as a guard against faults, that weren´t detected before, but normal thinking during the test design should help to avoid some of the more obvious traps.
But as it is confirmed again by this paper, one can´t rely on that only because the test was done by a serious organisation, was peer reviewed or something else.
Only analysis of the test design itself (and the results) can help during the evaluation.

Unfortunately it is much easier to do a bad (means invalid, not objective and not reliable) test than a good one.
There is a tendency of readers to accept even quite obviously flawed tests if even the personal beliefs are supported by the results; therefore a lot of false negatives (or positives) are produced.

Wishes
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.