Where is proof that what math models are good enough?
I've measured speaker cable changes of 45cm. And I am convinced about the results. What measurements have you done?
Working electronic equipment, e.g. microwave ovens 🙂 And the sun is still coming up every day.
What were those results?
I'll let you search through the thread for my post about two years ago.🙂
Have you ever noticed the change in precision of timing when the sun comes up?🙂And how over history this saying has changed?
Have you ever noticed the change in precision of timing when the sun comes up?🙂And how over history this saying has changed?
Last edited:
Still no objective argument. Did you listen what Whitlock had to say about cables with different color coding? And did you get Whitlock's basic message? Again, lock at slide 7.
Thank you very much for the links.
His tutorial on magnetic induction, ground loop topology effects, transmission line theory and application are rudimentary and incomplete. It is interesting to see mis-conception at this level. I was hoping for better.
He states that he searched for information on where that loop voltage comes from. He did not do a very good search. I initially posted on five different forums, starting May 4, 2004, with many posts on this since.
Soongsc, very good work. Again, thanks.
Cheers, John
Last edited:
Difference in dielectric material diameter due to die manufacturing tolerances. So what do you think the basic message is?
I've learned a lot form your posts over the years as well. Thanks.
The value of all this discussion is hope that someone might be inspired, and possibly find things that might have slipped by the eyes of others.
Application permitting, I might try the 4 lead cable configuration some time.
Don't think so because unlike you and others here he tries to explain why. If you want to discuss the validity of Ohm's law then I'm the wrong person to talk to.
I have done so for the last 6 years. Obviously, to no avail, as Bill was unable to find anything.
Search my moniker for posts here, AH, AVSforum.
Or you can pm me for specific questions.
Cheers, John
Holy Moses - and all the rest of that family too!
Basically- what some of you are now saying is that Ohm's Law, the transmission line equations, and roughly all theory that has been taught in engineering in the last 100 years and basically runs the world these days, are all wrong, because you say it is, - but you just can't prove it!... ??????
Basically- what some of you are now saying is that Ohm's Law, the transmission line equations, and roughly all theory that has been taught in engineering in the last 100 years and basically runs the world these days, are all wrong, because you say it is, - but you just can't prove it!... ??????
Basically, you must re-read my post and understand what was actually stated.
There is a significant difference between stating that a person misconstrued the theory, and stating that the theory is incorrect.
A good example is transmission line theory. At audio frequencies for example, the velocity of propagation along short lengths of wire must be mathematically transformed to accomodate the line to load mismatch, the effective dielectric constant (which is proportional to the produce L and C), and the length of the line.
The only time one can consider the velocity of propagation to be proportional to 1/sqr(LC) is when the load impedance matches the line impedance. That never occurs with IC's, nor with speaker runs.
Easily proven. And, I have done so in the past.
Cheers, John
- Status
- Not open for further replies.