I don't believe cables make a difference, any input?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would not rely on professional musicians with general hi fi playback. However, they seem to be very good with the reproduction of their own music. This is based on working with professional musicians for approximately 5 years, in Rock, Folk, and Classical music.
They do NOT appear to need hi fi reproduction, in general, as much as people who actually like to listen to the music being played, and it can be shown that their brain scans are different in that they use both the left side and the right side of their brain. Perhaps some here, should read up, before responding. I too, have heard the difference between Teflon and Polystyrene made by the SAME manufacturer, in the same phono eq. It is important to many serious hi end audio designers. We even discuss it between each other.
 
Meaning each and every time there is an attempt to express the peak placement of a transient the system re-settles to a stable point of a 'momentary DC conditional'. At that point ---it collapses/slams to zero and then recovers in an opposite motion/spin/polarity.

Or, thousands of times per second on the single point that the ear uses to understand and decipher signal by, ie --- the peak edge of the transient. The situation is far more complex than it appears.

If you wish to comment Sy, please go back and address the point that for Einstein to produce his engineerable and complete Unified Field Theory, which he handed to the world in 1927-28 in Russia, of all places..he had to drop special relativity and General relativity (Yes he did, he dumped them BOTH). This is mentioned, as for Einstein to do that, he had to actually, for the first time, dump Heaviside and dump Lorentz and use the PROPER full 20 equations 20 unknowns of Maxwell's ~REAL~ Treatsie on electromagnetism. The one with the quaternion notation that explains torsion-tensor spiral multi-direction/vector wave particle forces in explicit perfection. Ie, the missing piece of the math that is confounding us - to this day. This was what was in the Unified Field Theory of 1927-1928..and it worked beautifully. But shush, you are not supposed to know that. Go back to sleep.

WWII and the scientific paranoia that arose in the early/mid 30's surrounding that -- assured that Einstein was suddenly silent due to the forces that surrounded him and the same forces laid waiting for others- concerning any such work done by anyone, anywhere. After the war, the whole situation of extreme secrecy was far worse and has carried forward to this day.

Einstein never revisited it as when he became a foundling member of the Builderburgs, he was forced out of his own knowledge base. He spent the rest of his life warning us.

I'm still waiting for a Unified Conspiracy Theory.

John
 
Just imagining a real conversation, Im not from the the facebook twiter generation.

It would be so much better (real) to sit at the bar and have this conversation. I think we all have a lot more in common than comes across in this type. (guess thats why we are here) Wish I was going to Burning Amp!
 
Last edited:
To me this statement is the height of arrogance when those making the statement will not participate in any test where the two capacitors are the ONLY difference.

I have several friends (professional musicians) who not only can't hear that difference, they can't hear the difference between a JFET source follower and a uA741 unity gain buffer.

Hi Scott. I will gladly take this challenge. But, perhaps its unfair in my case, because. . . well for an illustration, right now I'm sitting beside the shelf with twenty-one buckets of capacitors. Usually, I can select one for seemly results at a sensitive small signal spot in 15 minutes or so.

Example: Polypro caps are efficient to an extreme and tend to facilitate driving the next stage harder than most other types of caps (unless there's a series resistor to null the difference). A point: In NO way could I tell you that you have a polypro cap installed just by hearing your rig. However, I could tell you if you have a hard and efficient drive from your amp. This is suitable for large area coverage.

Professional musicians can tell you about the effects from caps, upon swapping caps, but in their own terms of frequency response and dry versus wet reverb. But, you don't want large scale equipment to ring, even if they like it. 😉

Its possible to get far too obsessive about caps at the input, as that may be the least important cap in the audio rig. If deciding amongst one of five likely samples doesn't work perfectly (quickly too), then there is a problem that is Not located at the input. Exception: If cap swapping makes a large difference, then please correct the impedance mismatch before proceeding farther with capacitor selection.

Model by doing and test by proving.

If you need some help with those caps, just ask. Its neither difficult nor expensive. Even a small touch of clarity selected to be appropriate for your individual equipment, can be a joy that is magnified by the number of tracks played on the equipment. On this, there is absolutely no relationship between performance and price range.
 
I would not rely on professional musicians with general hi fi playback. However, they seem to be very good with the reproduction of their own music. This is based on working with professional musicians for approximately 5 years, in Rock, Folk, and Classical music.
They do NOT appear to need hi fi reproduction, in general, as much as people who actually like to listen to the music being played, and it can be shown that their brain scans are different in that they use both the left side and the right side of their brain. Perhaps some here, should read up, before responding. I too, have heard the difference between Teflon and Polystyrene made by the SAME manufacturer, in the same phono eq. It is important to many serious hi end audio designers. We even discuss it between each other.

Music educators do different things too. Listening "on center" is rare with this group. Like musicians, slight ringing (slightly reverberant) is preferred along with a somewhat laid back sound. It seems that the treble boost preferred is at slightly lower pitch than average. Like musicians, they're also not very picky about playback equipment for home use, possibly because most available equipment is unlike a live performance. Most will thrill out to a small radio as often as possible.
I think that they want this: "The presentation must not distract from the music."
Do you find that to be true as well?

P.S.
Kudos to anyone who can tame a Phono EQ or Baxandall for hi-fi use.
 
Unlikely. That 'max' into the nominally 8 ohm Dr K below. If that was labeled a Wavac amp's response posters would be all over it like bankers on the Fed. Consistency is lacking.

Drop RR a line. I don't know him, but from his writing he comes off as a pretty reasonable guy. Certainly has some impressive experience. And a paragraph down, he talks about just that sort of response variation. "Response changes this large can be easily heard in an A-B listening test."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.