Eek this another problem all together. Don't get me wrong I use EQ but it's just to offsett what these mastering engineers do to most every recording and not to correct a room. But eh that is another topic all together. I actually have wondered if maybe that is why CDs are so damn bright - weird "calibration" by the pros and just too much "room treatment" which probably just leads to the high end being weak.
.
Don't encourage him.....in my view he is a flamer.
Oh, Im a flamer....nice.
Stay on topic please! Or do you have a problem with the rules 😉
He is dead now but he use to do demos near where I grew up and he would place a 20 sqft mat 200 yards out.
than he would ask someone to pick a corner 😉
He was an incredible canadian golfer, very cool story.
Lets make a deal.How about "...many scientists say there are no difference...." This way we leave science the right to make some moves and perhaps surprise us 🙂
Yes it must be similar to a guy that hit a small white ball with a stick the whole day long. 😉
OK, you don't like a flat response, should I change my system now?
Then you don't belong in a cable thread.
Me too.
One day when you hear a high-end amplifier you might change your mind.
Problem is, "science" doesn't say that and can't as a matter of logic. The best that can be said is, "There is no evidence to support it."
Sure.
But if we use science all the time. NO-ONE (except those that have double blind whatevers) would be allowed to say. I use this or that topology or feedback or part and I like the way it sounds.
Yip you listen like you read, 😀 I thought he must be dead after a 200 year shot.
You've said:
The missplaced passion you have is your defense of something that isnt defendable not the passion for audio but Im cool with your insult since some will say Golf is a 4 hour walk ruined.
Never said that. I simply say I know Im altering my signal to something less then accurate and Im okay with that.
Wow, I don't belong?? Thats cool, I apologize for interrupting.
I still have that $1K US (that might be too much for you) if you want to really challenge a what you think is a low high guy like me.
Last edited:
Accurate what? The EQ starts at the mic and ends at mastering. A lot of recordings are bass heavy or light etc., is adjusting them subjectively a sin.
"Accurate" as in some people believe setting up a system to be flat is accurate setting a house curve or having a curve that rolls off the highs would be inaccurate (as you put it a "Sin"). When I talk about EQing Im talking about EQing a system in room is independant of any recording with Audyssey or similar.
I forgot to ask Mr Visser what amp I should go out and buy to compare before we have our challenge?
I didn't mean it as an insult, just a similar passion. I don't understand the "misplaced" though and why do I have to defend my passion?
Sometimes you came over as if your way is the only acceptable way.
Sorry Doug, that came over wrong, meant to suggest that a cable thread will interest "purists" more, if that doesn't interest you why bother in a cable thread.
You've lost me here.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.