Hello members,
There have been several queries regarding using Class-D amplifiers for driving AC turntable motors, often of the synchronous type. I would therefore like to show a few simple methods for obtaining decent results using a 3-phase motor. These methods use Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE) that can eliminate all harmonics up to the 10th, with further improvements possible by adding an LC filter before the motor, much like in Class-D amplifiers. The techniques used here are very well understood, and in use by the power industry for decades. I shall also share some of the significant published literature on the topic for those interested in the 'details'.
Some of the features of the presented methods are:
Thanks.
There have been several queries regarding using Class-D amplifiers for driving AC turntable motors, often of the synchronous type. I would therefore like to show a few simple methods for obtaining decent results using a 3-phase motor. These methods use Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE) that can eliminate all harmonics up to the 10th, with further improvements possible by adding an LC filter before the motor, much like in Class-D amplifiers. The techniques used here are very well understood, and in use by the power industry for decades. I shall also share some of the significant published literature on the topic for those interested in the 'details'.
Some of the features of the presented methods are:
- Open-loop drive for all kinds of sinusoidal flux synchronous motors - wound-field / separately excited, permanent magnet or reluctance types.
- Suitable for large / small motors with no changes to underlying philosophies.
- Suitable for star, delta and open-ended winding motors.
- No multilevel inverter is used in any of these methods (though the final phase voltages may have multiple levels).
- Minimal switching transitions for negligible switching losses and higher efficiency / smaller heatsinks / better reliability / lower EMI when compared to high frequency PWM.
- Guaranteed elimination of all harmonics up to 10th order for low acoustic noise and torque ripple with the best efficiencies possible.
- A single DC bus is used wherever possible, no dual power supply required.
- Implementation could be on any simple/inexpensive MCU without the need for DAC / SPI / I2C or PWM modules as the drive waveform(s) are suitable for pre-programming and may be directly output using GPIO pins.
- Accurate timing / speed control could be obtained using a MHz crystal, with different wave-forms for different record speeds.
Thanks.
Last edited:
Background Information (for the interested):
The Fourier series expansion for the above waveform is such that each term of the expansion is given by:
The plus / minus sign depends on whether the harmonic under consideration is odd (negative) or even (positive). Thus, by equating the coefficient of the sinusoidal component to zero, we're able to completely eliminate a particular harmonic. For example, eliminating the 7th harmonic (only) implies:
(degrees)
The Fourier series expansion for the above waveform is such that each term of the expansion is given by:
The plus / minus sign depends on whether the harmonic under consideration is odd (negative) or even (positive). Thus, by equating the coefficient of the sinusoidal component to zero, we're able to completely eliminate a particular harmonic. For example, eliminating the 7th harmonic (only) implies:
Last edited:
And, when we look at the pulse waveform and its FFT, the seventh harmonic is eliminated as expected. The extra switching for eliminating the harmonic occurs at 8.5 degrees and 180 - 8.5 degrees, as calculated above.
Note that the switching position is in degrees and is therefore applicable to a waveform of any frequency though the example shown below is that of 50Hz, with the 7th harmonic occuring at 350Hz.
Now, it is fairly easy to see that eliminating one harmonic (7th in this case) required an extra switching transition in the waveform, which also implies that eliminating every single harmonic into the kHz would require as many switching transitions. This is why this method is suitable for eliminating only a "selected set harmonics", so that the switchings / losses / EMI are also minimised.
Fortunately, this fact also suits the case of a 3-phase motor drive in which many triplen (3n) harmonics are already eliminated, and the only the remaining energy concentrated in the 5th and 7th harmonics need to be removed.
Note that the switching position is in degrees and is therefore applicable to a waveform of any frequency though the example shown below is that of 50Hz, with the 7th harmonic occuring at 350Hz.
Now, it is fairly easy to see that eliminating one harmonic (7th in this case) required an extra switching transition in the waveform, which also implies that eliminating every single harmonic into the kHz would require as many switching transitions. This is why this method is suitable for eliminating only a "selected set harmonics", so that the switchings / losses / EMI are also minimised.
Fortunately, this fact also suits the case of a 3-phase motor drive in which many triplen (3n) harmonics are already eliminated, and the only the remaining energy concentrated in the 5th and 7th harmonics need to be removed.
Modifying the equation in post #2 to eliminate two harmonics (5th and 7th) gives a system of trigonometric equations known as transcendental equations
that are more conveniently solved using computers. The mathematics for the same, being beyond the scope of this thread (and forum), is therefore omitted. Highly interested members may refer to the following paper:
J. Chiasson, L. M. Tolbert, K. McKenzie, and Z. Du, “A complete solution to the harmonic elimination problem,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 491–499, Mar. 2004.
Available online at: https://web.eecs.utk.edu/~tolbert/publications/apec_2003_complete.pdf
The resulting waveform for eliminating 5th and 7th harmonics and its FFT spectrum are shown below.
We see that:
As we see above in the FFT of the phase voltage, the first dominant harmonic is the 11th.
that are more conveniently solved using computers. The mathematics for the same, being beyond the scope of this thread (and forum), is therefore omitted. Highly interested members may refer to the following paper:
J. Chiasson, L. M. Tolbert, K. McKenzie, and Z. Du, “A complete solution to the harmonic elimination problem,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 491–499, Mar. 2004.
Available online at: https://web.eecs.utk.edu/~tolbert/publications/apec_2003_complete.pdf
The resulting waveform for eliminating 5th and 7th harmonics and its FFT spectrum are shown below.
We see that:
- Orders 2, 4, 6, 8,... etc. are already eliminated using half-wave symmetry of the waveform.
- 5th & 7th are eliminated using SHE modulation.
- The triplen (3rd, 9th, 15th) would be removed by the 3-phase system and as a result, they wouldn't appear in the motor phase voltage, as shown below.
As we see above in the FFT of the phase voltage, the first dominant harmonic is the 11th.
Last edited:
The switching angles used in the above-mentioned method (5th & 7th elimination) are:
To implement the above modulation, simply include these switching timings into the basic waveform in post#2.
Note that these angles are fixed and may therefore be "burnt" into the program memory of a simple MCU and then be directly put out through GPIOs as the gate-drive signals for the inverter.
To implement the above modulation, simply include these switching timings into the basic waveform in post#2.
Note that these angles are fixed and may therefore be "burnt" into the program memory of a simple MCU and then be directly put out through GPIOs as the gate-drive signals for the inverter.
The preferred circuit diagram for Method 1 above (5 & 7th harmonic elimination) uses the floating star-connection as shown below. However, a delta-connected motor maybe used if desired. An open-end winding motor is capable of being reconnected as star or delta and should not be a problem in any case.
Last edited:
Method 2 - Non-SHE method for eliminating all harmonics of order 6n±1 (for n = odd).
- For open-end winding motors.
- Only 50% square-waveforms are used with no extra switchings as in SHE.
- Requires two inverters and two separate (isolated) DC voltages in the ratio 1: 0.268.
- More sophisticated and higher performance when compared to the single supply SHE methods.
Look, with all do respect, who is interested in 3-phase PWM systems for dummies? Specifically in turn table with sub millivolt signal sources?
It's plain inappropriate. Those waveforms were widely used in 70-s for fans and such and are a part of power electronics basic course.
What about speed/torque control and vector modulation for better DC bus voltage utilization? Let's call it poor joke... Who need a second hand account of a textbook anyway
It's plain inappropriate. Those waveforms were widely used in 70-s for fans and such and are a part of power electronics basic course.
What about speed/torque control and vector modulation for better DC bus voltage utilization? Let's call it poor joke... Who need a second hand account of a textbook anyway
Modulation of the dual-inverter circuit in post #7
The main inverter (powered by Vdc) is fed with a three-phase square-wave of fundamental frequency while the auxiliary inverter (powered by 0.268Vdc) is fed with a suitable waveform so as to cancel all unwanted harmonic components upto the 11th, according to the following expressions:
The main inverter (powered by Vdc) is fed with a three-phase square-wave of fundamental frequency while the auxiliary inverter (powered by 0.268Vdc) is fed with a suitable waveform so as to cancel all unwanted harmonic components upto the 11th, according to the following expressions:
The waveforms for Method 2 are shown below with the FFT of the final motor phase voltage:
As seen above, all harmonic pairs around 6n for n = odd i.e. 6n±1 have been eliminated, as opposed to only 5th &,7th for the SHE method above.
As seen above, all harmonic pairs around 6n for n = odd i.e. 6n±1 have been eliminated, as opposed to only 5th &,7th for the SHE method above.
We don't know who is interested, and I'd therefore say that we keep an open mind. Besides, if a 2-phase motor can be used that way, a 3-phase motor which is electrically and mechanically superior is a certain candidate, and it may not be necessary to run these using ROM-driven DACs and linear amplifiers like many are, hence this thread.
Yes, and so were turntables ! However, these 70s techniques are effective even today and many are still not aware of these simple but elegant techniques that have existed for a long time !!
i just use a nice quiet BLDC 3 phase motor, an Arduino, a BLDC motor shield, and the SimpleFOC software running Open Loop. and it outputs nice clean SpaceVector or Sinusoidal waves.
super easy.
super easy.
Do not hesitate to specify in what exactly:
Wide band harmonic source? Textbook pictures with IGBT? Please suggest an appropriate IGBT part number, just for heck of it.
It's leading to nowere... today it takes 3 pcs of off the shelf class D amps having no harmonics per say.
P.S. This was used when transistors were crap and every switching instance did matter.
And eggheads came up with ingenious solution to generate harmonics in the opposite phase to cancel existing ones.
It's eased filter design making ones lighter, which did matter... in avionics... and in other "movable assets."
Then yet another eggheads bettered switches rendering it obsolete.
Method 3 - SHE of 5th, 7th, 11th and 13th harmonics - circuit diagram from post #6
Switching pattern (A phase)
Phase voltage (A phase)
FFT (phase voltage)
The phase voltage spectrum is missing all harmonics up to order 17. Many harmonics of order between 20 and 30 have also been suppressed by the modulation. The switching angles used above were:
- Single DC supply
- Regular 3-phase inverter.
- Standard star or delta motor.
Switching pattern (A phase)
Phase voltage (A phase)
FFT (phase voltage)
The phase voltage spectrum is missing all harmonics up to order 17. Many harmonics of order between 20 and 30 have also been suppressed by the modulation. The switching angles used above were:
Last edited:
Method 4 - Non-SHE method for eliminating several lower and higher order harmonics - circuit diagram of post #7 with aux DC bus changed to 0.29Vdc.
The inverter is modulated as in Method 2, but using slightly different expressions given below:
Waveforms
FFT (phase voltage)
The FFT shows that several lower and higher order ones are eliminated. However, the 7th harmonic is present and therefore needs to be suppressed using the LC filter.
- Open-end winding motors only.
- Square-waveform based harmonic cancellation.
- Two inverters and two isolated DC sources in the ratio 1: 0.29.
- Eliminates more harmonics when compared to the non-SHE method from post #7, 8, but does not eliminate the 7th that needs to be suppressed using additional means.
The inverter is modulated as in Method 2, but using slightly different expressions given below:
Waveforms
FFT (phase voltage)
The FFT shows that several lower and higher order ones are eliminated. However, the 7th harmonic is present and therefore needs to be suppressed using the LC filter.
Why do you want to aggressively silence this thread?
Simply don't read it.