Sonic info
Hi Harald,
Are you happy with the sound quality? What have you compared it to?, and what have you driven speaker wise with this brute...?
Best Regards
Sheriff
Hi Harald,
Are you happy with the sound quality? What have you compared it to?, and what have you driven speaker wise with this brute...?
Best Regards
Sheriff
What were the rail voltages you used? How does one manage at these kind of power levels without short-circuit or overload protection? Sound??
That's exactly the kind of amp I've been looking for.
Have you made it yet?
Do you think that changing the PMBTA92 for a Bc *** type would have any affect to its operation? (BC556 for example)
and the output pairs to MJ15003/4? or maybe TIP3055/2955 for an easier to manage package.
Other than that I can get everything required to make it.
Well done
Have you made it yet?
Do you think that changing the PMBTA92 for a Bc *** type would have any affect to its operation? (BC556 for example)
and the output pairs to MJ15003/4? or maybe TIP3055/2955 for an easier to manage package.
Other than that I can get everything required to make it.
Well done
Hello!
About the sound quality: Spheric, precise, powerful. Perfect for PA use. Problems can arise with cheap drivers that tend to be sharp, because precise+powerful+sharp sound can be unpleasant (the amp itself does not sound sharp). The results with good drivers and bass speakers were excellent (not just my opinion (which is a little biased 🙂.
@Samuel: The amp does have a current limiter/overload protection.
@frost: The transistors were chosen because of their CE-voltage.
With the given rail voltages the PMBTA-transistors can be changed to others with at least 150V CE-Voltage, the inner power transistors can be changes to ones that can withstand 1xouter+1xinner voltage= 170V, the outer can be changes to ones with outer-inner voltage=80V. The power transistors should be able to handle 15A continous current. And a small SOA chech should be done.
The 3055/2955 can not handle these voltages and cannot be used therefore. The BC-types as diff-pair also can not be used because of their CE-Voltage.
Harald
About the sound quality: Spheric, precise, powerful. Perfect for PA use. Problems can arise with cheap drivers that tend to be sharp, because precise+powerful+sharp sound can be unpleasant (the amp itself does not sound sharp). The results with good drivers and bass speakers were excellent (not just my opinion (which is a little biased 🙂.
@Samuel: The amp does have a current limiter/overload protection.
@frost: The transistors were chosen because of their CE-voltage.
With the given rail voltages the PMBTA-transistors can be changed to others with at least 150V CE-Voltage, the inner power transistors can be changes to ones that can withstand 1xouter+1xinner voltage= 170V, the outer can be changes to ones with outer-inner voltage=80V. The power transistors should be able to handle 15A continous current. And a small SOA chech should be done.
The 3055/2955 can not handle these voltages and cannot be used therefore. The BC-types as diff-pair also can not be used because of their CE-Voltage.
Harald
fr0st said:That's exactly the kind of amp I've been looking for.
Have you made it yet?
Do you think that changing the PMBTA92 for a Bc *** type would have any affect to its operation? (BC556 for example)
and the output pairs to MJ15003/4? or maybe TIP3055/2955 for an easier to manage package.
Other than that I can get everything required to make it.
Well done
BC556 is not useful, due it can handle only 65V. Try to use MPSA92 or 93, which can go up to 200V, of higher.
For output the MJE15003/4 is OK, but I think MJ15024/25, or MJ21193/94 (even MJL 21193/94) is much better.
sajti
Is there anybody who can explain, how I can count the voltages for class G amplifiers?
For this amplifier the total psu voltage is +/-125V. But why 45+80? Why not 62,5+62,5? What is ideal for dissipation?
Thanks: sajti
For this amplifier the total psu voltage is +/-125V. But why 45+80? Why not 62,5+62,5? What is ideal for dissipation?
Thanks: sajti
What is ideal for dissipation?
That is actually depending on program material. The voltage ratio that gives the highest efficiency for continuous full power isn't necessarily the one that is best for normal program material.
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:
That is actually depending on program material. The voltage ratio that gives the highest efficiency for continuous full power isn't necessarily the one that is best for normal program material.
Regards
Charles
OK, but how I can deteminate it, in practice?
sajti
Douglas Self has written an article about class-G amps where he presents some curves generated by playing around with the voltage partition. I you like it I can mail it to you.
In general you would have to be able to perform integral calculus to calculate things like that properly. But there are also the possibilities of simulation (like P-SPICE) or you can do an approximation with programs like Excel.
Regards
Charles
In general you would have to be able to perform integral calculus to calculate things like that properly. But there are also the possibilities of simulation (like P-SPICE) or you can do an approximation with programs like Excel.
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:Douglas Self has written an article about class-G amps where he presents some curves generated by playing around with the voltage partition. I you like it I can mail it to you.
In general you would have to be able to perform integral calculus to calculate things like that properly. But there are also the possibilities of simulation (like P-SPICE) or you can do an approximation with programs like Excel.
Regards
Charles
Charles,
if possible, please send me the Self article! Due my Hotmail box is limited, please send to: asajtos@pantel.hu
During this time I checked the QSC site. The use 50%-50% in their amplifier...
Thanks:
sajti
Have you ever considered using complementary Mosfet transistor to switch the collectors of the outputs to the higher voltage instead of more power BJT's??
This is interesting, i was talking to a guy selling german made class G amps in teh weekend at a music expo, i forget the brand name..
He said they had switch mode supplies that would change the rail voltages depending on the power required.. or is that class H?
anyway, does anyone else know of other schematics? This stuff is really intriguing!
He said they had switch mode supplies that would change the rail voltages depending on the power required.. or is that class H?
anyway, does anyone else know of other schematics? This stuff is really intriguing!
Class G switches between two supply voltages. Class H continuously varies the supply voltage. A switch-mode PSU definitely makes sense for class H to make the most of the efficiency boost.Optical said:This is interesting, i was talking to a guy selling german made class G amps in teh weekend at a music expo, i forget the brand name..
He said they had switch mode supplies that would change the rail voltages depending on the power required.. or is that class H?
anyway, does anyone else know of other schematics? This stuff is really intriguing!
Optical said:This is interesting, i was talking to a guy selling german made class G amps in teh weekend at a music expo, i forget the brand name..
He said they had switch mode supplies that would change the rail voltages depending on the power required.. or is that class H?
anyway, does anyone else know of other schematics? This stuff is really intriguing!
As I know Labgruppen make special power amplifiers. They use class D amplifier to get +/-5-10V power supply for the conventional AB class power stages. The PSU also modulated with the output signal, so they can keep the dissipation low...
Class G founded mainly to avoid second breakdown for the output devices. For +/-125V not easy to find any power transistor to use (MJ15024/25, MJ21193/94 are out of question).
Of course class G reduce the dissipation, but I think this is just a feature....
sajti
cunningham said:Have you ever considered using complementary Mosfet transistor to switch the collectors of the outputs to the higher voltage instead of more power BJT's??
BTW... I am designing a class G using complementary hexfets but driving just two output BJT's. The main reason of course is that I am using hi-current output devices driving 4Ohms and they will not handle any more than 90V...85V to be safe. Found out that a common source is the best way to switch to the higher voltage and also regulate it.
@ Harald, I would love to make it. what power supply did you use? any schematics on the supply.
do you have a parts list?
do you have a parts list?
About the efficiency: Power dissipation is about 1/2 compared to a normal amp in a "bad" case and 1/3 in a "good" case. Amplitude statistics is an imortant factor for efficiency. Usefull thermal design would be a temperature-controlled fan that will turn on only seldom.
About the power supply: I took a 2x30V 300VA transformer for the lower supply and a 2x80V 1000VA for high voltage supply with normal bridge rectifiers.
Harald
About the power supply: I took a 2x30V 300VA transformer for the lower supply and a 2x80V 1000VA for high voltage supply with normal bridge rectifiers.
Harald
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- High Power Class G amplifier