I have everything in one room, albeit a small room ~11' x ~13.5'. The CW IIIs dominate the room. By the time I got everything setup I didn't have time this evening to let everything normalize for a decent listening session. I understand that 119 DB is quite (intolerably) loud. However I was talking about peaks of less than a second.
I have two DB meters I will measure what I listen to as far as an average. If as I suspect the average is in the 75-85 DB range then 25-35 DB peaks above that for rim shots and other transient sounds which are part of music would not be unexpected. I also have a calibrated Mic & REW, but I think that would be overkill for this exercise.
Attachments
I may have been born at night, but not last night.
I know how loud 110 DB at my listening position is. In my post where I mentioned this volume I used the term "peak" I further clarified it by using the term "transient" in a later post.
One time, while the missus was out, I was testing my multi channel system. I fired up an SACD of Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." I had out my Radio Shack DB meter I was averaging about 100 DB with peaks in excess. That was about as loud as I was able to tolerate for any length of time.
However if you have an average listening volume of X, say 75 DB and there is a louder passage it could increase the volume to say 85 DB. Now on top of that there are transients which could exceed 20-30 DB. I posit you need an amplifier which won't clip or otherwise distort on those transients.
The CW IIIs are exceptionally efficient speakers. So even with a fly weight amp you should get most of what you are looking for and they will sound a lot more dynamic than an 86 DB sensitive speaker with a 200 watt amp.
If however you have an amp/preamp system with a very low noise floor and gobs of power I believe you will be able to hear a positive difference over the fly weight amp/CW III combination. At this point it is theoretical for me, but now that I have ultra sensitive speakers, I intend to play around. I don't have a good 2 channel SS preamp but I do have the M125s, a Dynakit ST70 unmodified, an NAD 2200 PE, an Adcom GFA 555 II an old Dynaco SS amp and lastly a Crown K1.
This is a pretty good slice of mid fi power amps to play with. Hopefully the VTA SP9 (not SP12) will have a low enough noise floor and work & play well with all the power amps.
I know how loud 110 DB at my listening position is. In my post where I mentioned this volume I used the term "peak" I further clarified it by using the term "transient" in a later post.
One time, while the missus was out, I was testing my multi channel system. I fired up an SACD of Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." I had out my Radio Shack DB meter I was averaging about 100 DB with peaks in excess. That was about as loud as I was able to tolerate for any length of time.
However if you have an average listening volume of X, say 75 DB and there is a louder passage it could increase the volume to say 85 DB. Now on top of that there are transients which could exceed 20-30 DB. I posit you need an amplifier which won't clip or otherwise distort on those transients.
The CW IIIs are exceptionally efficient speakers. So even with a fly weight amp you should get most of what you are looking for and they will sound a lot more dynamic than an 86 DB sensitive speaker with a 200 watt amp.
If however you have an amp/preamp system with a very low noise floor and gobs of power I believe you will be able to hear a positive difference over the fly weight amp/CW III combination. At this point it is theoretical for me, but now that I have ultra sensitive speakers, I intend to play around. I don't have a good 2 channel SS preamp but I do have the M125s, a Dynakit ST70 unmodified, an NAD 2200 PE, an Adcom GFA 555 II an old Dynaco SS amp and lastly a Crown K1.
This is a pretty good slice of mid fi power amps to play with. Hopefully the VTA SP9 (not SP12) will have a low enough noise floor and work & play well with all the power amps.