help, doubt about the difference between an integrated ba4560 and a 4558

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
a 4558 is one of the WORST opamps currently available. It's really only a pair of 741s in a DIP-8 package
Sorry but no.
What you are talking about is 1458, you missed by a few thousand :p

4558 is quite good (there´s a reason it´s a classic), specially because, contrary to all Op Amps of that era, this was the first one optimized for Audio, go figure.

Even after TL072 appeared, I kept using 4558 for transformerless input balanced mic preamps, because if driven from a low impedance source it was less noisy than others.
I´m talking actual use and compared side by side, not just datasheet swimming.

4558 was so good, that it was eventually upgraded (4560), rather than fully replaced. :eek:
VERY FEW components get that royal treatment,they just get swept away and fully replaced, not this trusty workhorse.

As a side note: even today humble 1458 is kept for one feature , not shown on datasheet but present there: in the simple "one dual Op Amp reverb circuit" many manufacturers (notably Marshall) have kept sourcing and using it.
Clearly it drives reverb tanks better than others.
Not because of cost or availability , amps using them bristle with TL072 or M5201 and keeping inventory of a different one MUST be justified by "something".
FWIW they were replaced by 2 or 3 parallel sections of TL07x, go figure.

And the "two 741 inside one package" does not need to be taken literally, even if printed on the datasheet, long ago 741 was the classic Op Amp (at least the first in wide use) and everything was compared to it ... even if actually much better
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.