Groner Topology Power Amp

Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
When browsing through old DIY articles, I found one interesting topology,
that seems was never built, at least not on this forum.
Here is a link to EETimes article "Samuel Groner New Topology",
unfortunately, only part 3 is readable (earlier parts come up with no images),
but never the less, this is the most important part that shows actual schematic of a (headphones ?) pre-amp.
Not sure if this material is copyrighted or not, so I'm not attaching it here.
I think Groner's article was also published in "Linear Audio".

This Groner topology can deliver very high slew rates (over 200 V/us), and very low Thd.
I tried to incorporate this design into a power amp, and to simplify the task, I used op-amp in the input stage,
instead of LTP with current mirror (as in the original design).
Also, increasing current from 1mA to 2mA in the next stage (Q11/Q12) seems to improve stability.
Sim results look good, but one thing that needs improvement for sure, is clipping behavior.
Any suggestions how to do that? Sim file attached.

Update April 2022:
Actual build of the amp, and revised schematic are in post #10
 

Attachments

  • clip1.png
    clip1.png
    6 KB · Views: 244
  • fft_1khz.png
    fft_1khz.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 237
  • fft_10khz.png
    fft_10khz.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 598
  • lmk_groner.15dec21.hawk.hexfet.3.asc
    17.3 KB · Views: 115
  • lmk_groner.15dec21.hawk.hexfet.3.png
    lmk_groner.15dec21.hawk.hexfet.3.png
    45 KB · Views: 629
  • thd_10k.png
    thd_10k.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 419
  • thd_1k.png
    thd_1k.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 250
  • olg1.png
    olg1.png
    25.5 KB · Views: 416
Last edited:
Here you go, friend:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 4

No guarantee about images though (EDIT: now I see you already mention this). These EE sites are really bad at migrating their content, not just this one.

Maybe take these URLs and plug them in Internet Wayback Machine, you might get lucky.

I could find some images by clicking on the non-displayed one in Part 1 or 2 I think. No such luck on Part 4.

Maybe Samuel can give you a copy or Jan himself.
 
Last edited:
Account Closed
Joined 2010
Really like your circuit.
Does it make any difference giving Q11 and Q12 a bit more voltage by tying the collectors to the rails instead of 0V?
Have you checked out Edmund Stuart's active clamping for clipping?
Active clamp

Paul
First improvement, but small, on the other hand, i couldn't find a single shematic getting all you need for a high power amp simpler than this one: https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/zeta-2-by-lars.360202/. I think using diamond buffers everywhere isn't the silver bullet to escape all sorts of problems in audio.I had simillar arguments about it here: https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/improved-diamond-buffer-design.130952/page-6#post-6877207
 

Attachments

  • gronnerc.png
    gronnerc.png
    59.2 KB · Views: 152
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Here you go, friend:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 4

No guarantee about images though (EDIT: now I see you already mention this). These EE sites are really bad at migrating their content, not just this one.

Maybe take these URLs and plug them in Internet Wayback Machine, you might get lucky.

I could find some images by clicking on the non-displayed one in Part 1 or 2 I think. No such luck on Part 4.

Maybe Samuel can give you a copy or Jan himself.
Or here: https://linearaudio.net/articles?f[0]=field_author:388

Jan
 
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
Does it make any difference giving Q11 and Q12 a bit more voltage by tying the collectors to the rails instead of 0V?

I tried it (collectors going to 15V rails) , and it makes no difference whatsoever (beside power dissipation).
All sim results, including clipping, look the same, as far as I can tell.
So I guess I will settle on R10 being 330 Ohm to fix the clip. I'm going to build a prototype amp of this design.
 
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
Dreamth,
When I tested your change, it seemed like improvement - FFT profile (at 1.2Vpp input signal) was flatter.
Then I noticed, that with your change, idle current of the output devices went down from 70mA to only 5mA.
When idle current is adjusted back to ~70 mA, then all sim results look the same as in the original schematic from post #1.
Am I missing something?
 
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
It took over 3 months, but I eventually built this amp.

Have to say it was pain in the neck. Had to revise my original schematic/sim from post #1.
At the end, it turned out that instead of trusting my own simulations,
I should have sticked to the original values proposed by Samuel Groner. Apparently he knows what he's doing :)
My biggest problem was that current in the first block of 2 transistor after op-amp was 2mA (sim was showing better results), vs. 1mA proposed by Groner. I wasted lot of time playing with compensation to get rid of oscillations, while the simplest solution was to simply use 1mA instead of 2 mA (R4/R5 changed to 15k (from 6k8)).
Anyway, sim still looks perfect, and amp's results on the oscilloscope also looks good.
Revised schematic, sim and photos attached. According to the sim, it should be the best amps built by me so far; also the most complex.
As it can be seen from photos, I build a chassis with the mosfet output stage, that can be used for different input/vas boards.
This is the same output stage I already used in numerous other amps, e.g. in the 'unusual amp thread'.
Tested in many amps, and performing very well. Now I can try different input/vas boards, without too much effort.

Not sure if anyone ever built Groner amp (discreet or otherwise), I could not find ANY actual builds on this, and other forums.
Especially given that he never published complete amp - just input and VAS stage are described in the articles.
Interesting thing - I usually use LT1056 op-amp in the sims - because this model is built-in into LTSpice, so it's easy for other people to run the sim,
without installing any extra models/libs.
But in the physical build I usually try TL071 - this op-amp is less temperamental, and rock solid.
In this case, TL071 actually did not work well at all, I had to use actual LT1056.
Of course, will try other op-amps very soon.

DSCN0712.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0711.jpg
    DSCN0711.jpg
    373.2 KB · Views: 141
  • sinus_10khz.jpg
    sinus_10khz.jpg
    318.9 KB · Views: 111
  • saw.jpg
    saw.jpg
    327.4 KB · Views: 106
  • sinus_78khz.jpg
    sinus_78khz.jpg
    329.5 KB · Views: 100
  • sinus_100kHz.jpg
    sinus_100kHz.jpg
    334 KB · Views: 106
  • square_1khz.jpg
    square_1khz.jpg
    316.8 KB · Views: 110
  • square_34khz.jpg
    square_34khz.jpg
    315.4 KB · Views: 107
  • triangle.jpg
    triangle.jpg
    324.7 KB · Views: 138
  • groner_lmk_thd1khz.png
    groner_lmk_thd1khz.png
    42.6 KB · Views: 241
  • lmk_groner.15dec21.hawk.hexfet.3.asc
    17.6 KB · Views: 63
  • lmk_groner.schematic.png
    lmk_groner.schematic.png
    42.8 KB · Views: 255
Last edited:
Congrat Minek! One of my favorite topology pushing the boundaries of opportunity. Excellent result. Never seen similar THD like this before. Waiting for listening tests especially your opinion about the mobility of trebles. (y)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2014
Paid Member
One more correction to the schematic.
Bipolar C7 220uF electrolytic has been added (shunt to the ground from the feedback loop).
Without it, DC output offset was about 100mV.
With it, it's 1mV.
Now, in addition to the blue color of the main PCB, red PCB for input/vas, 4 red LEDs per channel, I have 2 big
caps in 'toxic green' color added to it. Christmas time.
Slowly preparing for listening tests later today :)
 

Attachments

  • lmk_groner.15dec21.hawk.hexfet.3.asc
    17.7 KB · Views: 78
  • lmk_groner.schematic.png
    lmk_groner.schematic.png
    41.6 KB · Views: 186