Yes, it is.
I think EUVL's thread I mentioned above (#12) explains how to make an active functional clone of a passive crossover.
I think EUVL's thread I mentioned above (#12) explains how to make an active functional clone of a passive crossover.
What is the benefit of doing this? Isn't the goal of going active a matter of flexibility so the limitations/compromises of the passive can be overcome? So the driver combination can be optimized?