that looks very good. How will you be using it? Will you use it for Home theater surround sound (5 channels plus a subwoofer), or for a triamped stereo system? Or did you simply have extra parts and build channels that you might use later on?
I like the heatsink-box.
I like the heatsink-box.
Hello,
My intention was the triamplification
http://www.behringer.com/DCX2496/index.cfm?lang=ENG
A greeting
Angel.
My intention was the triamplification
http://www.behringer.com/DCX2496/index.cfm?lang=ENG
A greeting
Angel.
I should also study the PSU, but in principle I carry out this assembly according to the general approaches.
Nothing wrong with the Gainclone - your references are to blame. If you had a nice Akai amp as a reference you would absolutely love the GC.
I believe that you have reason.
Because they are some very good amplifiers and I didn't have experience with the Gainclone.
A greeting.
Because they are some very good amplifiers and I didn't have experience with the Gainclone.
A greeting.
Analog_sa
I have proven the Gainclone with a passive preamplifier and their result I improve notably.
Greetings.
I have proven the Gainclone with a passive preamplifier and their result I improve notably.
Greetings.
Interesting. I also use a GC with a transformer volume. The real GC fans seem to prefer active preamps - there seems to be a huge variation in listening tastes and expectations.
It is not always possible the application of passive preamplifiers, but me whenever I can I eliminate the active preamplifiers. They always add or they remove.
Angel
Angel
Hi angel,
I'm a firm believer in a good buffer for the gainclone, and use an old fashioned chip too, the LF353, for the exact same reason we chose the 3875 - it has an almost identical topology, and almost identical response, just significantly lower dissipation.
Tried the burr brown efforts - nice but very HiFi, and Nuuks buffer is a treat.
As to the why this should work better than a TVC - I cannot give a solid explanation (I am not an EE by trade), but I feel that there are some input resistance variations (that are offest by capacitance to give a net input impedance), that take good old current to solve, and more than a TVC/Passive can muster.
However, the buffer needs only to have unity gain, and you'll add around 9 parts or so to the signal path (one way or another) - still a very low parts count, and it'll cost little to try.
Have fun
Owen
I'm a firm believer in a good buffer for the gainclone, and use an old fashioned chip too, the LF353, for the exact same reason we chose the 3875 - it has an almost identical topology, and almost identical response, just significantly lower dissipation.
Tried the burr brown efforts - nice but very HiFi, and Nuuks buffer is a treat.
As to the why this should work better than a TVC - I cannot give a solid explanation (I am not an EE by trade), but I feel that there are some input resistance variations (that are offest by capacitance to give a net input impedance), that take good old current to solve, and more than a TVC/Passive can muster.
However, the buffer needs only to have unity gain, and you'll add around 9 parts or so to the signal path (one way or another) - still a very low parts count, and it'll cost little to try.
Have fun
Owen
Excuse,
This new preamplificador that I have proven is of http://www.borbelyaudio.com/eb1198116.asp very different to those previous of valve and passive.
Angel.
This new preamplificador that I have proven is of http://www.borbelyaudio.com/eb1198116.asp very different to those previous of valve and passive.
Angel.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.