Gainclone Cap Survey

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Re: Re: Caps

protos said:


Peter,

I think that perhaps that would not be the most cost efficient way to use BGN's.
If you use only 4 that would be 320 USD and if you wanted Super E that would set you back 640 USD (ouch!)
However with 8 x 680uf BGNx 35V (assuming your rails are below that) you get 1360 uf per rail per chip in super -e at about 90 USD total or thereabouts. That's a huge saving !

My rails are 36V and I believe 680 BG NX don't come in 50V. Anyway, I want to try those 1000u N types to see what the hype is all about😉
 
Peter I thought I've read somewhere on this forum that you said the 18V version sounded better than the higher voltage versions. Was this in the bass region? If so, do you think this could be related to the cap size, because logically to me it seems that the higher voltage version just put more stress on the caps especially in the bass region, no?
I was planning to do some comparisons myself, between inverted non-inverted, added dc-servo to get some feeling on the impacts on the sound. And the idea was to do this for my bi-amped system so i could also experiment a little with low capsizes for the highs and highs for the low, but for now i still have murphy to deal with (see other thread)
 
I never said it sounded better, I only said it makes more bass and in some systems the bass overpowers the rest of the frquencies and the tonal balance is not right. I'm not bass freak anymore and to me 22V sounds the best, with proper dynamics. Of course it all will be dependant on choice of transformes, diodes and caps. So you should also understand that it's best sounding only in my setup, others may differ.
 
Re: Re: Caps & batteries

Peter Daniel said:


I thought I need two per channel to get 24V. And car batteries are not recommended. I would use Panasonic 12V rechargable, I already have 4 of them at my disposal, but no charger yet😉

Peter, I didn't explain myself well.
I meant this:

2*24v transformer * 1.41 = 33.84 volts.

3*12volts battery (in series) = 36 volts.

So, this is a value close to what you get with a 24 volt transformer, after the bridges and caps.
 
nania said:
nobody special One thing that gets overlooked is that these gainclones prefer to be operated strictly Class B and so, many of the tenets of traditional Class AB power delivery become less important. The chip has excellent ripple rejection at exactly the same frequency where you would derive benefit from large capacitance. This amp thrives on fast power pulses with perfect phase delivery. If one capacitor has sufficiently low ESR it does the job admirably. Oh, and I should also mention that I suspect matching the ESR characteristic of these caps would also yield sonic benefits.

Thanks... I think I'm starting to understand it now. I will have to build one and see what all the fuss is about.
 
Of course I'm not sure of the result because these are not tested yet but think they could contribute to:

Clean the grunges from the diode bridge

Better regulatuion for the rails and

Fast acting for power demand which could be good when using small value capacitance.

If idle quisent current is to low for this application I would add some shunt resistance. :idea:

I would need though a higher voltage secondary winding to compensate for the voltage loss with the input inductors and provide some 300VA tranies.

Are inductors not applicable for class AB amps?
 
apassgear said:

I would need though a higher voltage secondary winding to compensate for the voltage loss with the input inductors and provide some 300VA tranies.

Are inductors not applicable for class AB amps?

At idle there is practically no current draw, so ther is no reason to increase voltage to compensate, when there is no voltage loss. As the current is being drawn the supplies will fluctuate.
 
I don't think that placing inductors in a gainclone power supply would be a good idea (also true for every class B and AB amp)

No inductors, no resistors, ni pi filters. Just caps!


Since you have a class B amp, the drawn current isn't constant at all; so the voltage drop across the inductor (or resistor) will vary, and so will your supply voltage do


If you want to regulate more, try active regulation.


A class B amp's PS can't be designed as a class A's one
 
bg alternatif

try 8 different brand 220 microfarad paralleled.
Gives you a wider range of different ESR, kind of low-Q ESR cap. Never tried it myself, but could work, since in the discharge cycle, current availability would by more evenly spread, since not all caps will discharge at the same pace. (Also reason total capacity should be a bit higher compared to the unique bg).
Load cycle will also be more spread-out in time.
 
PSU with inductors

Hi all,

I just signed up after following some of the threads for a while.

My current amp started with a few ideas from Thorston i.e. "try batteries with just a 1u cap across this pins" & "try inverting mode"

This gave quite a good result but slightly lacking in detail so I put in some DNM slit foil T network 10,000uf caps that I had.

🙂

This gave a result that ( along with more recent mods including removing the + input resistor ) I am VERY happy with and I regard as my current reference.

When building another amp for a friend I tried to emulate the same very smooth, detailed and natural sound that I have with batteries using a transformer & bridge.

After much experimentation & listening I ended up with schottkys, 2,200uf, choke, 4700uf, choke 10,000uf T network and then the 1uf across the pins. the result was almost indisinguishable from the batteries.

So I say if you feel like trying chokes go ahead and give them a try you might like what you hear

cheers

mike
 
Hi Mike and welcome to the forum.

My current amp started with a few ideas from Thorston i.e. "try batteries with just a 1u cap across this pins" & "try inverting mode"

Before somebody else asks, can you give us more details of your battery set up please? What type of batteries, voltages and do you use one set for both channels?

After much experimentation & listening I ended up with schottkys, 2,200uf, choke, 4700uf, choke 10,000uf T network and then the 1uf across the pins. the result was almost indisinguishable from the batteries

Again, if you could ellaborate - was this using a PSU in a separate case? If so did all the caps (except the 1.0ufd) go in the PSU with the chokes? And did you use one PSU for both channels or one for each?
 
You're reading too fast

Nuuk said:


I thought that batteries were DC and didn't need a rectifier so the 1.41 ratio didn't apply. 😎

Have you read what I said??!:bigeyes:
To have a voltage similar to what you get with a 2x24 volts transformer you need 3 12 volt batteries in series per rail.
And that's a fact.
Of cource you don't need the bridges with batteries.
The 1.41 ratio applies to the transformer with the bridges and caps.
That's why you need 3 batteries in series per rail.
Not 4.:bawling:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.