For my own use 😉
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133265
Can say that K40Y-9 + FT-1 does it better than K75-24 + MKP1835 😉
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133265
Can say that K40Y-9 + FT-1 does it better than K75-24 + MKP1835 😉
Malefoda said:For my own use 😉
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133265
Can say that K40Y-9 + FT-1 does it better than K75-24 + MKP1835 😉
Glup !
No comment for now... must digest first.... but that is what I was searching for right now.... thank´s!
And I guess it may depend on our personnal tastes. My attempt to make the K75-24 ok by itslef was a failure, not as " homogenic " ond the whole bandwith as the OEM MKC ( at least as a bypass cap in these amplifiers ). I had to play (and waste money) with other caps.
My (on the Aura then) choice to fit real PIO K40Y-9 with Teflon FT-1 was with comments taken here and there on the Net. And that was way better in all ways than the MKCs. They're my fit'n play winner. I'll be glad to have your feedback!
My (on the Aura then) choice to fit real PIO K40Y-9 with Teflon FT-1 was with comments taken here and there on the Net. And that was way better in all ways than the MKCs. They're my fit'n play winner. I'll be glad to have your feedback!
PIO K75-24 + MKP looks like a difficult combination.
Regarding the PIO + Teflon, I read that you keep the PIO character but with the extension of the teflon. Must sound quite good.
What values are you using ?
Ricardo
Regarding the PIO + Teflon, I read that you keep the PIO character but with the extension of the teflon. Must sound quite good.
What values are you using ?
Ricardo
- Status
- Not open for further replies.