recommend a supplier for the Power Supply caps and inductor coils.
You might save some money by going with a CRC instead of the CLC power supply. See F5 wiki.
just a thought.
HI brian
for caps I haved a good service from audiocap , Campbell is diyA user on vendor bazar, 5€ shipping cost to italy😉
or panasonic tsha from digikey
for heatsink if you want, we can do a combinate order from conradheatsink ,for MF35-151.5 62.64€ for a pair ,plus 68€ shipping ,with half price on ship not so bad.....
you can add later coil, from capsandcoils
for caps I haved a good service from audiocap , Campbell is diyA user on vendor bazar, 5€ shipping cost to italy😉
or panasonic tsha from digikey
for heatsink if you want, we can do a combinate order from conradheatsink ,for MF35-151.5 62.64€ for a pair ,plus 68€ shipping ,with half price on ship not so bad.....
you can add later coil, from capsandcoils
f5 heat question
good mornign campers
just fired up a new f5 with barross's big heat sink and have a few quesitons-
the mosfets run warm- I was hoping to get away from fans but maybe not this time, at about 125 degrees farenheit measured off the surface next to the mosfet- I can leave my finger on the device but its pretty hot-I left it running for about two hours yesterday, tweeking the bias, and that temp was pretty stable- is this too hot?
Second querie- the MUR3060twg are also running pretty hot at about 125 degree farenheit- I cann't tell from the data sheet- is this too hot?
thanks for your input
rob
good mornign campers
just fired up a new f5 with barross's big heat sink and have a few quesitons-
the mosfets run warm- I was hoping to get away from fans but maybe not this time, at about 125 degrees farenheit measured off the surface next to the mosfet- I can leave my finger on the device but its pretty hot-I left it running for about two hours yesterday, tweeking the bias, and that temp was pretty stable- is this too hot?
Second querie- the MUR3060twg are also running pretty hot at about 125 degree farenheit- I cann't tell from the data sheet- is this too hot?
thanks for your input
rob
Re: f5 heat question
Rob, up to 60-65c is okay for Mosfet temperature output, with temp probe directly touched to plastic casing of FET. Higher is not recommended. I usually bias till I get there. of course I do this over a course of a day (6-8 hours) to make sure the sinks are fully warmed up.
My temp probe is cel. so 65c is 150f.
My diodes never seem to run hot, I attach them to bottom of chassis however, in case they ever do. There maybe a problem there. With the heat we have been having, everything is probably running quite hot.
😀
rob lenk said:good mornign campers
just fired up a new f5 with barross's big heat sink and have a few quesitons-
the mosfets run warm- I was hoping to get away from fans but maybe not this time, at about 125 degrees farenheit measured off the surface next to the mosfet- I can leave my finger on the device but its pretty hot-I left it running for about two hours yesterday, tweeking the bias, and that temp was pretty stable- is this too hot?
Second querie- the MUR3060twg are also running pretty hot at about 125 degree farenheit- I cann't tell from the data sheet- is this too hot?
thanks for your input
rob
Rob, up to 60-65c is okay for Mosfet temperature output, with temp probe directly touched to plastic casing of FET. Higher is not recommended. I usually bias till I get there. of course I do this over a course of a day (6-8 hours) to make sure the sinks are fully warmed up.
My temp probe is cel. so 65c is 150f.
My diodes never seem to run hot, I attach them to bottom of chassis however, in case they ever do. There maybe a problem there. With the heat we have been having, everything is probably running quite hot.

125 F is about 52 C. Right next to the FET, thats pretty good 😀
What is your physical configuration of the FETs on the heatsink(s) How many, where etc.
You are talking about the 10.125" heatsink, right.
What is your physical configuration of the FETs on the heatsink(s) How many, where etc.
You are talking about the 10.125" heatsink, right.
Hi,
scientific wire company supply enameled copper wire on reels from 100grams to 1000grms.
If your order arrives on a plastic spool then you have a ready made air core inductor that will be much cheaper than buying from any coil supplier.
Rapid also supply on 500gram reels but they are slightly more expensive.
scientific wire company supply enameled copper wire on reels from 100grams to 1000grms.
If your order arrives on a plastic spool then you have a ready made air core inductor that will be much cheaper than buying from any coil supplier.
Rapid also supply on 500gram reels but they are slightly more expensive.
Re: f5 heat question
Maybe you can order about 10-12 inch lengths instead of 8 so they'll run a little cooler. The problem is the MOSFETs are so close together. I wished he made them a little beefier too.
rob lenk said:good mornign campers
just fired up a new f5 with barross's big heat sink and have a few quesitons-
the mosfets run warm- I was hoping to get away from fans but maybe not this time, at about 125 degrees farenheit measured off the surface next to the mosfet- I can leave my finger on the device but its pretty hot-I left it running for about two hours yesterday, tweeking the bias, and that temp was pretty stable- is this too hot?
Second querie- the MUR3060twg are also running pretty hot at about 125 degree farenheit- I cann't tell from the data sheet- is this too hot?
thanks for your input
rob
Maybe you can order about 10-12 inch lengths instead of 8 so they'll run a little cooler. The problem is the MOSFETs are so close together. I wished he made them a little beefier too.
If you can put your finger on the device it's not too hot. The usual
test is, can you put your hand on the heat sink for 5 seconds.
😎
test is, can you put your hand on the heat sink for 5 seconds.
😎
Has anyone experimented with device temp vs subjective sound quality or device temp vs distortion?
Uriah
Uriah
Well, as device temp in my book, is a function of power, yes.
The harder you bias MOSFET's, the lower distortion and so forth you get.
Till they go bang that is.
Magura 🙂
The harder you bias MOSFET's, the lower distortion and so forth you get.
Till they go bang that is.
Magura 🙂
I imagine that it could also be a function of heatsink efficiency. So when we bias up we get 'better' sound. So is this because the mosfet sounds better at a certain temp or is it because of the bias point. Maybe you bias it up to 2amps and it sounds great but is that because of the temp of the device or the current? Can we tune a heatsink to get better sound rather than biasing a mosfet to the point of destruction?
Uriah
Uriah
Nope, it's because of the current. No free lunch there.
I just have the luxury of loads of hefty heatsinks available, hence the tests and results.
Magura 🙂
I just have the luxury of loads of hefty heatsinks available, hence the tests and results.
Magura 🙂
Magura said:
Till they go bang that is.
Magura 🙂
--------------> Then back off a little

Ron
Not to be argumentative, I certainly appreciate the conversation. It just isnt working out with what I have heard yet. See TeaBag brought his F5 over and it took about an hour, little less, to sound good. So to me that meant that the heatsink had to get to certain temp. Following that logic I figured that the mosfet sounds best at a certain temp or at least above a certain temp.
Whats happening here?
Uriah
Whats happening here?
Uriah
udailey said:Not to be argumentative, I certainly appreciate the conversation. It just isnt working out with what I have heard yet. See TeaBag brought his F5 over and it took about an hour, little less, to sound good. So to me that meant that the heatsink had to get to certain temp. Following that logic I figured that the mosfet sounds best at a certain temp or at least above a certain temp.
Whats happening here?
Uriah
What you see there, is most likely that everything settles in the right parameters, which in the first place had been adjusted at full working temperature.
If you measure the circuit when it's cold, many measurements would be off target.
Magura 🙂
EDIT: BTW that's not being argumentative, I call that curiosity 🙂
Renron said:
--------------> Then back off a little
Ron
Almost 😉
Back off a little, till it takes a while for them to go bang

Magura 🙂
udailey said:See TeaBag brought his F5 over and it took about an hour, little less, to sound good. So to me that meant that the heatsink had to get to certain temp. Following that logic I figured that the mosfet sounds best at a certain temp or at least above a certain temp.
Whats happening here?
Uriah
I wouldn't be coming to such conclusion yet. There are many other low power circuits, that do not feature mosfets or need heatsinks, yet they are also claimed to sound better after an hour or so of warm up.
Someone said that the high temperature will lower impedance
But where I dont know
Another one claimed that classA works better with power supply with a bit higher resistance
Both very professional people
But where I dont know
Another one claimed that classA works better with power supply with a bit higher resistance
Both very professional people
Magura said:What you see there, is most likely that everything settles in the right parameters, which in the first place had been adjusted at full working temperature.
If you measure the circuit when it's cold, many measurements would be off target.
That's pretty much the case. Almost always the bias goes up with
temperature and the performance improves over an hour or so.
😎
Just got back from a swim with my daughter.
Thanks for all the answers guys. I really appreciate it.
Uriah
Thanks for all the answers guys. I really appreciate it.
Uriah
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F5 power amplifier