Since (I think I am correct here) the gain of a pentode is affected by the screen voltage. If one took a portion of the input signal to the control grid and amplified or attenuated it and applied the resulting signal to the screen (in addition to a fixed screen supply voltage) could one emulate a remote cut off characteristic using a sharp cut off pentode?
Yes, to a certain extent. You could just leave the screen unbypassed. But why not use a genuine remote cutoff valve? There was even one intended for audio - EF83.
Your bets bet for emulating a remote cutoff characteristic is to use a single series dropping resistor for the screen. If you don't regulate the DC, the screen voltage will come up as the screen current goes down. That will tend to keep the pentode out of cutoff. It's one of the reasons why you don't want to do that if your goal is linearity.
What are you trying to accomplish here? If it's for a receiver, well, there are just esssssss-loads of remote cutoff pents designed expressly for this purpose.
What are you trying to accomplish here? If it's for a receiver, well, there are just esssssss-loads of remote cutoff pents designed expressly for this purpose.
Many of the sharp cutoff pentodes that are used in audio amps and receivers have a remote cutoff version. The internal difference is the way the control grid is wound. A sharp cutoff pentode has a grid wound with a constant winding pitch. The remote cutoff grid does not have a constant pitch, so part of the grid cuts off before the rest.
6AU6 --> 6BA6
6EJ7 --> 6EH7
6SJ7 --> 6SK7
If this is for a variable gain amplifier look into a "dual control pentode". G1 and G3 are both control grids.
Actually it is not an rf or hi-fi application. The idea is a signal processor. What I am trying to do is amplify one side of the wave form more than the other and have it adjustable. Also would like to do it with current production tubes if possible.
I don't know if it is necessary, but it makes things easier if a few opamps are wired up to the tubes. Your design calls for some type of rectification to alter the gain on one half cycle. It could be a tube grid, or a diode. An opamp with a diode - resistor circuit in the feedback loop seems like a place to start.
I have been working on a guitar processor on and off for a while. I plan to stuff the whole thing inside a solid body guitar too. There will be tubes, and the primary signal path will be pure tube, but since there will be a microprocessor to store and recall settings, the opamps seem like a given.
I plan to enter the guitar in another design contest. My last chips and tubes entry won a prize that lead to writing a magazine article. Both paid quite well.
As I have said before, If you plan to sell any of your creations to working musicians, it must use tubes that can be obtained at a music store in the middle of nowhere. That severely limits the choices.
I have been working on a guitar processor on and off for a while. I plan to stuff the whole thing inside a solid body guitar too. There will be tubes, and the primary signal path will be pure tube, but since there will be a microprocessor to store and recall settings, the opamps seem like a given.
I plan to enter the guitar in another design contest. My last chips and tubes entry won a prize that lead to writing a magazine article. Both paid quite well.
As I have said before, If you plan to sell any of your creations to working musicians, it must use tubes that can be obtained at a music store in the middle of nowhere. That severely limits the choices.
Yes, tube availability is an issue. I assume that small signal pentodes of any type are uncommon in guitar shops. I don't mind some op amps in the peripheral circuitry in this case.
My thought was that putting a large enough in phase signal on the screen would make the gain continuously variable without any need for rectification as you would need for something like a compressor. Am I missing something fundamental?
My thought was that putting a large enough in phase signal on the screen would make the gain continuously variable without any need for rectification as you would need for something like a compressor. Am I missing something fundamental?
Probably not. I haven't tried it myself. The original Fender Champ used a 6SJ7 driving a 6V6. I built a few clones about 40 years ago. I could get a cool distortion sound out of it by swapping in a 6SK7 and driving the Champ with s simple one transistor preamp. THe extra gain allowed me to control the distortion with the guitars volume control and the playing style.
I discovered this by playing around. With guitar effects, that is mandantory. Another thing, what sounds great with one guitar, may sound bad on another. In my case the guitar build is far enough along that I can play it. The circuit experiments are just getting started.
Time to find an appropriate spice model and fire up the PC. 🙂 Thanks for the input. Better hit the sheets now as morning comes early.
Unbypassed stack of Schottky diodes under the cathode?
Well, thats really more like a square law cutoff for todes
what otherwise mighta bent to Child-Langmuir ^1.5 law...
Its a small step toward remote cutoff anyways...
Maybe if stacked Schottkys were all slightly dissimilar?
Well, thats really more like a square law cutoff for todes
what otherwise mighta bent to Child-Langmuir ^1.5 law...
Its a small step toward remote cutoff anyways...
Maybe if stacked Schottkys were all slightly dissimilar?
Is it the gain you want to vary or the degree of asymmetry? If gain, then remote cutoff is the answer if you want to use valves. Look at the JJ 6386 triode - expensive but particularly intended for compressors.
If degree of asymmetry then you definitely don't want remote cutoff, as these are designed to have an exponential response (like a BJT but more gradual) which gives the same assymetry regardless of the gain setting. You can get asymmetry by misbiassing any valve - people do it all the time!
If degree of asymmetry then you definitely don't want remote cutoff, as these are designed to have an exponential response (like a BJT but more gradual) which gives the same assymetry regardless of the gain setting. You can get asymmetry by misbiassing any valve - people do it all the time!
Well variable asymmetry is what I am after but if the gain varies in step with the signal (more gain as the plate goes positive) then are we not achieving assymetry? When you increase the screen voltage then the plate curves move up right? When you decrease the screen voltage the curves shift down. If this screen voltage were to follow the signal would it not generate exaggerated HD2?
Remote cutoff generates asymmetry, but you can't adjust the amount of asymmetry except by varying the input signal amplitude.
Putting some signal on g2 will affect the amount of asymmetry but will also affect the gain. If you just want some distortion then a silicon diode plus a couple of resistors can do that. To be more sophisticated, use some op-amps and diodes to make a full-wave precision rectifier then dial in variable amounts of this to the original signal - you can have as much or as little asymmetry as you want.
Putting some signal on g2 will affect the amount of asymmetry but will also affect the gain. If you just want some distortion then a silicon diode plus a couple of resistors can do that. To be more sophisticated, use some op-amps and diodes to make a full-wave precision rectifier then dial in variable amounts of this to the original signal - you can have as much or as little asymmetry as you want.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.