I've built an ECC82 based preamp based on the below quoted schematic. It works well and serves as a line preamp with either 6dB or 12dB of gain (selectable). I was however wondering what topology was used, it isn't a SRPP or a TTSA, so what is it? And what can I do to further improve on it? I've already removed the C17 capacitor as all of my sources are DC free, hence it serves no real purpose.
Any suggestions or comments are most welcome.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com

Any suggestions or comments are most welcome.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
SSassen said:I was however wondering what topology was used, it isn't a SRPP or a TTSA, so what is it?
The first stage of V1 is common cathode the next is a (self biasing) cathode follower.
You have an overly complex cathode follower. You don't need the coupling capacitor or the bias arrangement. Just connect the grid directly to the anode of the first valve and have a single 27k cathode load resistor. I assume that's a typo and that you haven't really loaded the output with a 5k6 resistor.
Thanks EC8010,
So what you're saying is I can simply omit C18 (68nF) and remove R15 (5k6) or replace with a more sane value, ie. ~47K. But I don't follow your other suggestion, are you saying I can simply remove R10 (1M) and R16 (680) and connect R8 (27K) directly to pin 8 of the ECC82?
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
So what you're saying is I can simply omit C18 (68nF) and remove R15 (5k6) or replace with a more sane value, ie. ~47K. But I don't follow your other suggestion, are you saying I can simply remove R10 (1M) and R16 (680) and connect R8 (27K) directly to pin 8 of the ECC82?
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
Yes, connect R8 directly to pin 8, and put a link between pin 1 and pin 7. Your first valve's anode voltage is ideal for DC coupling to the cathode follower.
I would make R15 1M or more.
I would make R15 1M or more.
Hi EC8010,
I've drafted up the changes you've proposed, would the following schematic accurately reflect them?
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
I've drafted up the changes you've proposed, would the following schematic accurately reflect them?

Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
Yes, that's it. You really don't need such a low value for R15 - all it has to do is to ensure that the output DC is at 0V. It's just possible that the cathode follower might oscillate at RF, and the standard cure is a 1k carbon resistor at the grid end between pin 7 and pin 1.
Hi EC8010,
I'll just put that 1K resistor between pin 1 and 7 for good measure, can't hurt and it'll reduce the changes of the cathode follower oscillating.
Thanks and best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
I'll just put that 1K resistor between pin 1 and 7 for good measure, can't hurt and it'll reduce the changes of the cathode follower oscillating.
Thanks and best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
The attenuator network (R17) is a bit scary. When you switch between 0/+6dB this will cause quite a large pulse at the output. Maybe that is why the corner frequency (C21/R15) was quite high in the first place?
Hi EC8010,
I guess the below schematic should then reflect all the changes, I'll get to work right now and implement them and post here to detail how it worked out in practice.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
I guess the below schematic should then reflect all the changes, I'll get to work right now and implement them and post here to detail how it worked out in practice.

Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
The voltage at the cathode of the cathode follower is likely to be about 5V higher than the anode voltage of the common cathode valve. I doubt if it will sound any better, but it will certainly be simpler, and I like simplicity.
Hi jane,
The preamp features a relay that mutes the output for about 3-seconds after you select the higher gain. It also does this when switching between input sources.
Actually, you might be familiar with this particular design, it is sold as the Velleman K8020 tube preamplifier kit, complete with a nice looking aluminum chassis. I bought the kit and assembled it and am now in the process of tweaking it a bit to unlock the full potential (or attempt to at least).
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
The preamp features a relay that mutes the output for about 3-seconds after you select the higher gain. It also does this when switching between input sources.
Actually, you might be familiar with this particular design, it is sold as the Velleman K8020 tube preamplifier kit, complete with a nice looking aluminum chassis. I bought the kit and assembled it and am now in the process of tweaking it a bit to unlock the full potential (or attempt to at least).
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
Alright, I promised to give some feedback regarding the modifications I made, so here it is. And excuse me beforehand for using hifi-journalist terminology, I wouldn't know how else to describe the subtle changes.
There's clearly an improvement, more depth in the soundstage but also more punch overall, percussion has more punch and treble is more defined and balanced. It sounded a bit muddy before by comparison.
Thanks for all the helpful suggestions.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com

There's clearly an improvement, more depth in the soundstage but also more punch overall, percussion has more punch and treble is more defined and balanced. It sounded a bit muddy before by comparison.
Thanks for all the helpful suggestions.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
The gain switching arrangement drastically changes the operating point of the common cathode amplifier, the more linear operating point is going to be the 12dB position as the operating current is twice as high as in the lower gain position.
The ECC82 is not noted for the best linearity, and operating it at higher currents considerably improves its performance. IMHO it should operate at a minimum of 4 - 5mA for good linearity, although at line stage levels you can usually get away with less current.
See Morgan Jones Valve Amplifiers 3rd edition for more information on tube linearity.
Kevin
The ECC82 is not noted for the best linearity, and operating it at higher currents considerably improves its performance. IMHO it should operate at a minimum of 4 - 5mA for good linearity, although at line stage levels you can usually get away with less current.
See Morgan Jones Valve Amplifiers 3rd edition for more information on tube linearity.
Kevin
Hi Kevin,
I'm not familiar with that particular book, care to educate me (us?) on what he's got to say about tube linearity in the circuit I'm using? Or can you give me some pointers perhaps? For instance you mention operating current, how is this calculated?
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
See Morgan Jones Valve Amplifiers 3rd edition for more information on tube linearity.
I'm not familiar with that particular book, care to educate me (us?) on what he's got to say about tube linearity in the circuit I'm using? Or can you give me some pointers perhaps? For instance you mention operating current, how is this calculated?
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
Get the book, you won't be sorry.
One of the gems in it was a comparison between ECC82 and other similar medium mu tubes, tested under conditions that would maximize linearity. The ECC82 did not fare well, having about an order of magnitude more distortion than a 6SN7.
One of the gems in it was a comparison between ECC82 and other similar medium mu tubes, tested under conditions that would maximize linearity. The ECC82 did not fare well, having about an order of magnitude more distortion than a 6SN7.
Hi SY,
I ordered the book and it should be arriving here sometime next week. I was however wondering what could be done to further improve this circuit? From what I've learned in these past few days the resistor in the anode of the cathode follower isn't a necessity and could well be affecting its linear behaviour. Furthermore what would be a proper bias current for the first stage? I've also looked into using a different tube and the ECC88 seems to be the most suitable for a preamp. Any more suggestions you might be able to help with are most welcome.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
I ordered the book and it should be arriving here sometime next week. I was however wondering what could be done to further improve this circuit? From what I've learned in these past few days the resistor in the anode of the cathode follower isn't a necessity and could well be affecting its linear behaviour. Furthermore what would be a proper bias current for the first stage? I've also looked into using a different tube and the ECC88 seems to be the most suitable for a preamp. Any more suggestions you might be able to help with are most welcome.
Best regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
Well, as it happens (ahem, harumph), I wrote a little exigesis on ECC88 cathode follower design. It's an excellent tube for CF service.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=58757
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=59244
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=64220
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=58757
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=59244
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=64220
If you use an ECC88 in CF, consider the option of using an extremely simple CCS instead of the resistor, like this that I'm using:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- ECC82 based preamp