Dynaudio Nuance Mk2 Picture's

Status
Not open for further replies.
WOW. 93 full screen images (totalling about 9 megabytes) detailing every single minute step of the assembly operation. There's something to be admired about this but I don't know what it is. In the last photo it's about half completed. Continued soon, I guess.
 
i am know on the half of the project maybe sunday i start with the veneer i think it would be a very nice speaker. ( the speakers i used are from the dynaudio esotec serie these are used in the dynaudio contour series)

maarten
 
I also once built a speaker with these two driver types, though mine didnt look as nice as yours. It wasn't a floorstander, its shape was more like the old Contour 1.3.

The most astonishing thing for me was the bass reproduction of this speaker. It was the first small speaker that I ever built and I never expected the performance that it had.

Out of curiosity I once connected them to a 400 Watt P.A. amp and turned the volume up. You couldn't get it bottoming with normal recordings (i.e. no explosions or the like, just music) the sound just went a little stressed and blurred, thanks to the woofer's progressive restoring force.

Regards

Charles
 
Hai,

The difference in the mk2 is that there is pritex used and no baf. and there is a closed cabinet for the tweeter ruud from speakerland has tell me this.
I used some tape on the bassreflex port for resonatie.
I only have to vineer it.
sorry for my english

Greetz maarten
 
Ahhhh,

that's a big difference even if you take in account that the "tweeter box" has always been separate from the beginning (ca. 1996). If you have the guts you can even fill this part sand after you protected the tweeter with some klingfilm
 
a new picture
 

Attachments

  • img_6166.jpg
    img_6166.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 368
Status
Not open for further replies.