Frequency graph
There cut off at 80-90hz
So domt care about much after that
I realize they are not as sensitive as some drivers below 35hz but well give them a go..
I am sure there better than my jbl 2240 ive had since 1998《♥♥♥》
There cut off at 80-90hz
So domt care about much after that
I realize they are not as sensitive as some drivers below 35hz but well give them a go..
I am sure there better than my jbl 2240 ive had since 1998《♥♥♥》
Some facts:This driver is good in a sealed config. also.
Tquaterwaves also: You should ask somebody to design it, if you like, has good behaviour.
What RMS power for a reference. (PA's or home.)
Yes it will have a better extension in low frq. than JBL and -2dB in sealed versus -5dB@50Hz JBL reflex, as a reference only.
It will be a full 100% sub, as I understand but you can take advantage of LTransforms for the reduction of the total volume (<100/85 liters). You can simulate both designs, to see direction for the final project. Driver goes very low but needs extra vol. 3/4 times bigger than JBL reflex.
As a note look at the thread: Optimum net volume for tapped horns by Petter Persson (reverse engineering of Tom Danley article). Have fun.
Im using a lab gruppen fp6400 per side and wiring each left 18 as 1 and right as 2 in a speakon nl4.. so the left channel of a 6400 will see 2.7 ohms and the amp will produce 2800w/ch..
For a pa system..
For a pa system..
Looks great. Will you be adding some horizontal bracing? Probably a good idea.
That's going to make some serious noise.
That's going to make some serious noise.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.