An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I'm gonna run a BOSOZ unbalanced in/balanced out and hopefully someday feed a nice pair of Aleph 2 monoblocks. Anyways what I'm concerned with is how I terminated the negative input, I did a search and I believe this is what Nelson recommended.
The other main question is with regards to the portion of the circuit in the red box. I'd be using this pot as an input level trim with one of these (dual gang) on each input either before or right after the switching relays. Am I correct in thinking that this would work? I'd like to be able to use only dual ganged pots in my circuit for simplicity's sake (trim, gain, and volume). Any other suggestions for tweaks I'm getting real close to ordering up the parts.
Thanks!
I don't know about everyone else, but that image doesn't show for either one of my connections, probably because GeoCities blocks external sites from linking images. You should probably just use the board's upload feature for adding a image.
Voume controls must be after the relays. And its better for you to use them on the output. because you will be lowering noise too at low volumes..
skaara,
Why is it that volume controls have to be after the relays? The pot on the input will be used to adjust for the different input signal levels depending on the sources used. To make the input signals all approximately the same level so that switching from say a CD player to a computer output doesn't dramatically change the volume.
I'm still gonna have my main volume control on the outputs. As discussed in this thread.
balanced volume control
Why is it that volume controls have to be after the relays? The pot on the input will be used to adjust for the different input signal levels depending on the sources used. To make the input signals all approximately the same level so that switching from say a CD player to a computer output doesn't dramatically change the volume.
I'm still gonna have my main volume control on the outputs. As discussed in this thread.
balanced volume control
If you are using separate pot for each input it doesn't matter where you place the relay. If you put the realy before the pot, the pot might load your source but i don't think it's a problem.
Thanks Peter, that's what I was thinking. It seems cleaner to me to put the pots before the relays, and then I don't have to worry about anything placing an unwanted load on the source.
Does it look right how I did the negative input? I'm pretty sure it's o.k. just need some reassurance.
Does it look right how I did the negative input? I'm pretty sure it's o.k. just need some reassurance.
The negative output looks OK. Actually you have to put pots before relays, otherwise they will all load the input of your preamp. I didn't thought about it initially.😉
If you will use separate pot for each input then they dont have to be after relays🙂
And ground the negative input..
And ground the negative input..
And if you want unbalanced in to balanced out, there will be losses on undriven side and you will have unequal voltage on + output and - output so I suggest you that you install constant current source as discussed in this thread opened by me because I had the same problem with unbal -> bal.
You have 2 options, mosfet ccs or bipolar ccs, I chosed bipolar because it sounds better.. Its wery easy, just put enough heatsinking on transistors.
http://diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5558
You have 2 options, mosfet ccs or bipolar ccs, I chosed bipolar because it sounds better.. Its wery easy, just put enough heatsinking on transistors.
http://diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5558
As I see it there is no other place than before the relay to put the pot (as mentioned by Peter). Since each pot is to attenuate any one input that input source will always be loaded by the pot, when in use, irrespective of the placing. BUT, if we put the pots after the relays then all pots will be in effect parallelled with their respective setting meaning that we will decrease the input impedance for ALL inputs this way (e.g. 6 inputs using 10 K pots set half way will have 6 times 5 K in parallell which is like 833 Ohms instead of the 5 K with one pot connected). Furthermore the change of one pot will affect all inputs as the parallelled value changes (and setting an input really low will almost short out the other inputs) kind of massive fake-law arrangement. If the pot is before the relay then only the used input pot is used and thus only one pot loads the input -> maximum input impedance and independent settings.
At least that is the way I understand the description earlier in the thread.
/UrSv
At least that is the way I understand the description earlier in the thread.
/UrSv
Is there really a problem with bosoz ubal in to bal out ? This the first time I hear about it. What are all those people out there with bosozs doing with their single ended sources ?
I'm confused now !
Secondly , can somebody please explain how to implement all those 5 pots in practice. I see on the pass site most people use only output vol pots which are 2x2ganged or 4ganged. So what do you do with the other ones do you use nominal r values or small pots or what?
I'm confused now !
Secondly , can somebody please explain how to implement all those 5 pots in practice. I see on the pass site most people use only output vol pots which are 2x2ganged or 4ganged. So what do you do with the other ones do you use nominal r values or small pots or what?
Thanks Peter,
But I still can't understand what this loss means in practical terms. Is it a matter of loss of gain only or is somebody suggesting that there is a sonic degradation. I guess in one sense there will be less CMRR (?). Does this make a case for using the Aleph P over the bosoz although in another thread Nelson said that he couldn't detect any sonic difference between the two.
What about my question regarding use of pots ? Any comments ?
But I still can't understand what this loss means in practical terms. Is it a matter of loss of gain only or is somebody suggesting that there is a sonic degradation. I guess in one sense there will be less CMRR (?). Does this make a case for using the Aleph P over the bosoz although in another thread Nelson said that he couldn't detect any sonic difference between the two.
What about my question regarding use of pots ? Any comments ?
When converting unbal => bal @ 20db gain (R15=120Ohm) You looses 10% of the swing at the undriven side.
When converting unbal => bal @ 10db gain (R15=400Ohm) You looses 20% of the swing at the undriven side.
Wehter you uses constant current sources or not, you will loose half the gain when converting unbal=>bal. Acctually, you won´t loose anything, simce it has never bin there, but compared with bal.=>bal. You only get the half of that.
The losses at 10% or 20% will only degrade the CMRR, and proberly lowering CMRR with 10% or 20%.
When converting unbal => bal @ 10db gain (R15=400Ohm) You looses 20% of the swing at the undriven side.
Wehter you uses constant current sources or not, you will loose half the gain when converting unbal=>bal. Acctually, you won´t loose anything, simce it has never bin there, but compared with bal.=>bal. You only get the half of that.
The losses at 10% or 20% will only degrade the CMRR, and proberly lowering CMRR with 10% or 20%.
But with ccs the output voltages of bosoz will be equal.. The only problm that i encountered with adding ccs to bosoz was that with then I can hear a little hum, which wasnt present before/it was dead silent🙂 I dont know why..
Is length of the wire to ccs transistors important from aspect of increasing hum (mine is around 4 cm, because I had to put transistors to proper heatsink)?
Is length of the wire to ccs transistors important from aspect of increasing hum (mine is around 4 cm, because I had to put transistors to proper heatsink)?
You are right about the equal outputs with CCS.
Your length of the wire to the CCS shoud not be a problem.
I can´t tell whats wrong. The CMRR shoud be much better, so any hum from the powersupply shoud be gone.
Your length of the wire to the CCS shoud not be a problem.
I can´t tell whats wrong. The CMRR shoud be much better, so any hum from the powersupply shoud be gone.
I used 6.2V zener, 100ohm resistor and bd239 which I had on hand.. Could something be wrong with any of these?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.