Maybe you also should mention that the logo must be printable also. => not too much "fuzz"AudioFreak said:Just to give you all some idea of what standard of art we are looking for, Jan's entry is the only thing so far that would even be considered and we are looking for alot better than that before we are gonna part with the prizes.
I think "less is more" is valid here also.
OK, i'm going to step in with some constructive critism...
1st off, any logo needs to work as a gif. And in the case of karma's latest, the white will need to be transparent (Bas with his has an added "background "flag" which defines the space around the logo.
dave
1st off, any logo needs to work as a gif. And in the case of karma's latest, the white will need to be transparent (Bas with his has an added "background "flag" which defines the space around the logo.
dave
Attachments
As you can see above, you have to be very careful of shadows & such -- the above ends up being restricted to a white background..
dave
dave
So you want something that can be used with a transparent background for merchandises
and another one with an image in the background, like Jan's one?
and another one with an image in the background, like Jan's one?
No, just a single one that will serve all purposes. Jan's one could have any background in place of the white around the edges and would not be adversely effected.Bricolo said:So you want something that can be used with a transparent background for merchandises and another one with an image in the background, like Jan's one?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Site
- Site Announcements
- diyAudio Logo Competition Draft Entries