Dirty USB ?

I am attempting to create a digital playback device (i believe they are called 'renderers' now) to feed hi res audio to a dac. I would build this device based on either PC or Pi hardware.

As these do not tend to have spdif outputs, I am relegated to using USB or optical. I read that USB is the 'best' choice.


I also read that the clocking on onboard USB is bad and I either need a precision clocked USB card or an external 'reclocker' ( I fail to see how this could work. But I'm stupid). Incidentally, a 'recommended' add on board manufacturer claims the crystals supplied with his board are just for 'proof of concept', and for best results I should replace them with better ones. Eh ?


What would be the best solution here without breaking the bank ? The external dac I have is quite good. Or supposed to be.


Thanks,


Pete
 
I am attempting to create a digital playback device (i believe they are called 'renderers' now) to feed hi res audio to a dac. I would build this device based on either PC or Pi hardware.

As these do not tend to have spdif outputs, I am relegated to using USB or optical. I read that USB is the 'best' choice.


I also read that the clocking on onboard USB is bad and I either need a precision clocked USB card or an external 'reclocker' ( I fail to see how this could work. But I'm stupid). Incidentally, a 'recommended' add on board manufacturer claims the crystals supplied with his board are just for 'proof of concept', and for best results I should replace them with better ones. Eh ?


What would be the best solution here without breaking the bank ? The external dac I have is quite good. Or supposed to be.


Thanks,


Pete

If you choose the pi way, there are plenty of dac modules and combos ready to play with that bypass usb and go with i2s or spdif.
 
Whether RPi, SPDIF, TOSLINK, USB, whatever is better depends. USB or I2S offer the most sample rates, and most digital audio formats. TOSLINK has built-in galvanic isolation, but isolation can be added to other transport methods. SPDIF offers lower jitter than TOSLINK, and usually supports higher sample rates too.

So, what kind of dac is it? Does is use or support ASRC? What is the source device? How much cost and complexity are tolerable? What kind of sound quality is sought?
 
Thanks for the replies. The DAC is built intro the amplifier (by means of an add on card). It offers USB, optical or coax. The 'renderer' will be PC hardware based, the mobo has optical and USB. I don't think coax is really an option on PC hardware these days. Music will be pulled by wifi from a NAS. Software will being either Volumio, Daphile, Daphile mealtime or Windoze with JRiver.

The manufacturer of the amp/DAC offers very little information bar the proprietary alphabet soup.



Pete
 
Last edited:
If we can see detailed closeup pics of the inside and outside it might help us to help you. The more information we have, the better. The lettering on the dac chip would be a helpful clue. The connector for the USB add on board might tell us something too, such as if its Amanero format. Hopefully, you are starting to get the idea.
 
Okay, thank you. Two of them then? Dual mono AK4490EQ should be able to play up to DSD256, do you know if your player supports DSD?

If DSD256 is supported, that will probably give the most satisfying audio reproduction. It would require a USB interface with ASIO drivers (if used with a Windows PC).
 
Last edited:
Supported modes of the dac are :

USB : DSD /2.8224MHz, 5.6448MHz,11.2896MHz(1bit) (11.2896 ASIO only)    
PCM/ 32kHz~384kHz,32bit
OPTICAL: 32kHz~96kHz, 24bit
COAXIAL:32kHz~192kHz, 24bit



You can see why I would prefer USB


Supported mode for the 'renderer' : DSD native and DSD PCM


Pete
 
A USB might need cleaning up. Sometimes galvanic isolation helps. If the clocks on the USB board are used to clock the dac chips, which might be the case in this situation, then improving the clocks may improve subjective 'sound quality.'