Direct drive ribbon amp power requirement?

But if each ribbon is small then each excursion will be small.
Looks like a top side heatsink would work.
Thermal resistance, junction - case = 2.2 k/W
Could use a CPU water cooler right on top of it.

If you create a large-ish panel from a bunch of individual ribbons and you cause this panel to emit low midrange and/or bass frequencies, it will have large excursions.

Have you ever owned and/or experienced panel speakers (electrostat, planar magnetic, etc)? They are highly unloaded at low frequencies and they make large excursions when asked to emit low frequencies.
 
Yeah but the mass of the small drivers would mean less distortion vs a single large one no? For example you don't see anybody complaining about doppler distortion in headphones drivers.

Near field vs far field. You are making my point for me. Headphones have small excursions because they are almost in your ear. A large planar mid-woof is meters away from you.

A planar headphone diaphragm is orders of magnitude lighter than a large planar mid-woof.

The distortion of planar magnetic speakers is in part due to the fact that the magnets are behind the diaphragm making the force on the diaphragm not linear over excursion distance. In other words, they are not push-pull.

A collection of small diaphragms performing the job of one large diaphragm pushing lots of air at low frequencies will not be lower in distortion.

Now, if the individual small diaphragms are all push-pull and the large diaphragm is not push-pull, then you have a point. If that is your point, then you need to clearly make that point.
 
Headphones have small excursions because they are almost in your ear
And yet my HD800s sound quite good from across the room. Open back headphones don't lose much volume off your head.

A large planar mid-woof is meters away from you.

A planar headphone diaphragm is orders of magnitude lighter than a large planar mid-woof.

The distortion of planar magnetic speakers is in part due to the fact that the magnets are behind the diaphragm making the force on the diaphragm not linear over excursion distance. In other words, they are not push-pull.

A collection of small diaphragms performing the job of one large diaphragm pushing lots of air at low frequencies will not be lower in distortion.
I'm not making a planar..
 
Says in the title I'm making a ribbon. I've been very clear about the specifics of the design. The magnets are posted to the sides of the foil, not behind it.

If the ribbons are free-swinging and only attached at the ends, then I do not see any advantage placing many of them in parallel. All of the ribbons that I have built, have virtually no usable output below 1kHz.

If the ribbons are spread apart with magnets between them, you will have comb filter problems.

The only way to make usable lower frequencies is to block the front of the ribbon from the rear making the speaker into a drum-head with a baffle and no longer a ribbon.

If you devise a way to make a good full range speaker out of a bunch of ribbons, hats off to you. I would enjoy seeing such a design.
 
If the ribbons are spread apart with magnets between them, you will have comb filter problems.
Why, because of variations in the magnetic fields or because of the distance between ribbons?
The only way to make usable lower frequencies is to block the front of the ribbon from the rear making the speaker into a drum-head with a baffle and no longer a ribbon.
Here's a quote from "lowmass"
If your going to make a "full range" ribbon then you have a tall order but it can be done. about the best you can do is take a tall (5-6 feet) ribbon with a large open back baffle down to about 80 hz then over to a sub.
I have made them this way and the best result I had was with 2 inch wide ribbons and large magnets. I wouldn't use NEO magnets in this. Grade 5 or 8 ceramics are better. Neos are waaayyy too expensive in this size anyway.
I have taken them "full range" (no subs). With EQ and wide baffle they will go low, quite low in fact BUT really only loud to about 50hz.
 
Yes because of the distance between ribbons.

Notice that he says to EQ. This will trade lower extension for SPLs and will introduce Doppler distortion. When you make a ribbon which carries high frequencies move large excursions, you are modulating the highs with the lows. This is why Magnepan's best speakers have a mid-woof panel and separate ribbon tweeter. ...And.. the same reason Apogee had a mid-woof panel and a separate ribbon tweeter.
 
Yes because of the distance between ribbons.
But if I mount the magnets sideways the distance between the ribbons is only like 1.5 milimeters. Is that still too much?
Notice that he says to EQ. This will trade lower extension for SPLs and will introduce Doppler distortion. When you make a ribbon which carries high frequencies move large excursions, you are modulating the highs with the lows. This is why Magnepan's best speakers have a mid-woof panel and separate ribbon tweeter. ...And.. the same reason Apogee had a mid-woof panel and a separate ribbon tweeter.
I see. What crossover frequency do you recommend for the tweeter?
 
Last edited:
But if I mount the magnets sideways the distance between the ribbons is only like 1.5 milimeters. Is that still too much?

I see. What crossover frequency do you recommend for the tweeter?


Your magnets are 1.5mm thick? How are the magnets mounted?

The crossover freq will depend on how well the midrange rolls off as frequency increases. As a practical matter, I have used from 1kHz to 3kHz. I think that the slope is more important than the exact crossover freq. First order networks are not steep enough.The ribbon will jump out of the gap with a 1st order 1kHz crossover freq.
 
Your magnets are 1.5mm thick? How are the magnets mounted?
Like this but with thinner magnets
yVGhoi3.png
 
Like this but with thinner magnets
yVGhoi3.png

That helps quite a bit.

Will your implementation be much larger? This one looks quite small.

I recommend driving the very center ribbon with only treble. All of the other ribbons should be driven with only the midrange.

Another thing that you will experience is a notch in freq resp at the freq where the distance between facing magnets is a 1/4 or 1/2 wave length. I can't remember which. For the Magnepan ribbon tweeter, the notch is 9 kHz.
 
I'm going to stack them like this
FAyYNhE.png

So the horizontal and vertical dispersion are even.

The dispersion will be different at every frequency. There may be one magic frequency where the dispersion will be "even". All of the other frequencies will be something other than "even".

You will have comb filtering.

My guess is that this will be an experience not unlike the McIntosh speakers with dozens of individual dome tweeters.

If you build it and you like it, that is all that matters.
 
Yeah the distance between the ribbons will literally be 1.6mm or less.
Since I'm making modules of 4 ribbons I'll be able to stack them to any dimension I wish.

Although I need to take into account the impedance, this is the key factor what supply voltage I end up using. I'm planning on running the supply at 20A idle, that allows for 40A swings before it starts to get iffy, although my 4'' ribbon was pretty loud on 1.5A swing so I doubt it will need that much, better to be safe than sorry I guess.
How low of an impedance do you think I can realistically get the "load" to be? That is a key factor that will determine the power supply design. If I can keep it under 1 ohm that would be ideal.
Try to model them in "The Edge"
I am not knowledgeable enough to know what I'm doing in that software.
 
Last edited:
have you successfully crafted your project? I'm also working on making a headphone like the SR1A
i tried plugging it into my ipad and having to turn the volume all the way up but the sound is still very low. i just want the volume to be a little louder but not damage my hearing and i don't know how. I'll probably have to buy a portable audio amplifier. but as far as I know and calculate, these amplifiers are only about 0.1-0.2Ampere. this makes no sense with ribbon headphones that require high amps and low voltage. besides i don't know how many amps i need for it.
there are solutions offered is to add a small resistor in. What do you think about this.