I'm mulling over the design of a 300B amp. I want to run the 300B as a single-ended triode. The rest of my audio chain uses differential signaling so I would like this 300B amp to have differential input.
One could, of course, just ground the (-) pin of the XLR connector and take the signal single-ended off the (+) pin, but that defeats the purpose of the differential signaling. Another thought would be to start with a resistively loaded differential stage and use one of the outputs from it to drive the 300B (via appropriate cathode/source follower, etc). And finally, one could use an op-amp diff amp to deliver a single-ended signal to a normal single-ended 300B amp. Oh, and transformer input is also an option, though, in my humble opinion, not a viable one.
Of these options, I like the differential pair the best. But does it make sense to go about it this way?
~Tom
One could, of course, just ground the (-) pin of the XLR connector and take the signal single-ended off the (+) pin, but that defeats the purpose of the differential signaling. Another thought would be to start with a resistively loaded differential stage and use one of the outputs from it to drive the 300B (via appropriate cathode/source follower, etc). And finally, one could use an op-amp diff amp to deliver a single-ended signal to a normal single-ended 300B amp. Oh, and transformer input is also an option, though, in my humble opinion, not a viable one.
Of these options, I like the differential pair the best. But does it make sense to go about it this way?
~Tom
Look at kenpeters' work:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tube...l-unbal-using-tubes-without-transformers.html
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tube...l-unbal-using-tubes-without-transformers.html
Sure, any differential stage CAN do this, but is that the best approach?
The diff pair is my preferred approach - mostly because I'm very familiar with it - and it looks like everybody else has arrived at the same conclusion.
thanks,
~Tom
The diff pair is my preferred approach - mostly because I'm very familiar with it - and it looks like everybody else has arrived at the same conclusion.
thanks,
~Tom
Oh, and transformer input is also an option, though, in my humble opinion, not a viable one.
Why not? Something like a Jensen JT11-P1 or a Cinemag 15/15 would give you superb CMR, galvanic isolation, and have bandwidth and distortion well better than any SET is likely to have.
tomchr, I'm in the process of building a small SET with a balanced input served simply by an XLR feeding into a transformer, and then into a volume control attenuator, which then feeds into a driver tube before the output tube.
Nowt wrong with an input transformer!
Nowt wrong with an input transformer!
Why not keep it differential right up the the 300B and use an interstage transformer to couple the driver to the output tube and convert to single-ended? This would be the best approach IMO.
John
John
I was discarding transformers on the grounds of my preconceived notions of high distortion and high cost. Looking at the Jensen and Cinemag products, I definitely take back the "high distortion" part. Those trannies are IMPRESSIVE!! and offer CMRR that rival many modern op-amps. THD < 0.02 % even at 20 Hz! Nice. The Jensen is $80-ish. Cinemag don't publish prices. I'm a little afraid to ask. If you have to ask, you can't afford it.
Has anyone of you ordered from Cinemag and have an idea of the pricing?
I know interstage transformers have been used to drive a 300B in the past. I also understand that the 300B wants a low-impedance drive. I wonder what the output impedance of those interstage transformers are if they're driven by a source/cathode follower. I think that would be the bottleneck on performance of the system.
Thanks,
~Tom
Has anyone of you ordered from Cinemag and have an idea of the pricing?
I know interstage transformers have been used to drive a 300B in the past. I also understand that the 300B wants a low-impedance drive. I wonder what the output impedance of those interstage transformers are if they're driven by a source/cathode follower. I think that would be the bottleneck on performance of the system.
Thanks,
~Tom
I was discarding transformers on the grounds of my preconceived notions of high distortion and high cost. Looking at the Jensen and Cinemag products, I definitely take back the "high distortion" part. Those trannies are IMPRESSIVE!! and offer CMRR that rival many modern op-amps. THD < 0.02 % even at 20 Hz! Nice. The Jensen is $80-ish. Cinemag don't publish prices. I'm a little afraid to ask. If you have to ask, you can't afford it.
Has anyone of you ordered from Cinemag and have an idea of the pricing?
I know interstage transformers have been used to drive a 300B in the past. I also understand that the 300B wants a low-impedance drive. I wonder what the output impedance of those interstage transformers are if they're driven by a source/cathode follower. I think that would be the bottleneck on performance of the system.
Thanks,
~Tom
Contact Steve Eddy. He switched from Jensen to CineMag because of favorable pricing. 😉
A 6SL7/5751/7F7 SRPP should provide the voltage gain needed. An IRFBC20 in Tubelab's Power Drive will neatly take care of dragging a 300B's grid slightly positive.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Differential input, SET output