Different filters on identical drivers

I discovered a commercial speaker manufacturer did something interesting. They use ‘the same tweeter’ in various speaker models. But the high-pass filter for these tweeters has only two configurations. And it is conventional second-order slope.

A ) C1 = 4.7 uF, L1 = 0.3 mH
B ) C1 = 6.8 uF, L1 = 0.2 mH

Type A will be found in all ‘bookshelf’ models that are equipped with these tweeters while type B will be found in ‘floor-standing’ with the same condition. For the crossovers of midranges, they are three-way speakers, they are the same on all models. The difference is only on tweeter’s.

Can anyone tell the difference between these two types of crossover or conjecture the reasons for them, please?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0504.jpeg
    IMG_0504.jpeg
    34.3 KB · Views: 27
Last edited:
Well, the truth is that I’m thinking it might involve to the lobing, off-axis, baffle width, something similar to these. But, my knowledge in Physics and Acoustics isn’t much enough to confirm anything, so I came to ask people here. Could anyone who understands it please help explain?
 
we'd need to know what the drivers are, their positions on the baffle, frequency, impedance & phase responses to do more.
Ok, let me give two of them for comparison. They’re ADS L880/2 and ADS L1290/2 speakers. Their tweeters and midranges are identical while differences are on woofers and cabinets.

ADS L880/2
Box dimension: 330mm. (W) x 585mm. (H) x 295mm. (D)

ADS L1290/2
Box dimension: 265mm. (W) x 1063mm. (H) x 300mm. (D)
 
When designing a crossover, it is important to achieve the desired acoustic response, and the electrical filter is generally different from the theoretical (calculated) one. Most often, it is a custom filter to nicely fit the drivers by phase and amplitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: presscot