You badly mixing quality with "fit for a task". Sorry.
You very clearly implied that. Sorry
That's not mixing. That's a definition. And you can have a different one. But you shouldn't assume yours is the only one. Sorry.
Please read it again. I was talking about a specific case. I didn't imply anything. Sorry.
You've made a storm in a teacup about a point that wasn't even in the original question. I tried to politely explain my point of view, but you keep imposing yours. OK, I don't care. But then you want to tell me what my requirements are. And now you're putting words in my mouth. And you're being reported. Sorry.
