I use a modified C-DSP 8x12. It operates at 192 kHz/24 bit, so that is where my ±1mm time alignment comes from.
Gotcha, thx.
Is the modification just a matter of a different plugin? What's the channel count at that rate?
I've always wanted to go the other way with an openDRC, and reduce the sampling rate to 24kHz.....to get a higher effective tap count for sub duty.
A few of us petitioned miniDSP for such a plugin, a while back.....
Any advice on how to change the sample rate would be greatly appreciated 🙂
Oh, and curious why you raised to 192kHz?
It is a hardwire hack. An audio electronics genius buddy, spent some time looking at the schematics and came up with the solution for directly inputting stereo 192/24 data and outputting 10 channels of 192/24 from the dsp. It is definitely NOT an approved miniDSP mod. They were very cagey and unhelpful to questions. They probably thought we were commercial competitors. It is definitely for the experienced with the risk of trashing your $500 C-DSP 8x12[/QUOTE]Is the modification just a matter of a different plugin? What's the channel count at that rate?
It is native for the C-DSP 8x12. The mods includes an ultra low noise 12 dc supply to simulate the in-car environment that the C-DSP 8x12 is designed for. The whole caboodle is housed in an enclosure with new I/O connectors and an acrylic front panel. The LED indicate the dc supply nominal 12v and 6v. Sorry about the upside down photo below. I can't get it to rotate.Any advice on how to change the sample rate would be greatly appreciated 🙂
I listen mainly to LP. I have a very high quality vinyl rig. My long term goal is to capture my vinyl library in a digital format that is subjectively indistinguishable from the direct LP. 192/24 has finally got me close enough. Now I have the same level of resolution between my digital files and the audio path. I ran a 96/24 set-up for many years. 192/24 is better. Any differences between LP source and recorded 192/24 file that I can detect, are probably down to a coin-toss. I have heard greater differences between interconnects.Oh, and curious why you raised to 192kHz?
Attachments
Hi guys,
I spent yesterday evening and this afternoon messing around with the system.
I've obviously measured the delay of the individual drivers the wrong way last time round... I corrected that, and I now get a marked dip at the crossover frequency when I reverse the polarity of one of two "adjacent" drivers! I also found that the mid-range was the wrong polarity 😱
The whole system sounds much more dynamic now 😉
I also tried a setup with 24dB/oct Linkwitz-Riley (as opposed to Butterworth) and a bass-mid crossover frequency of 685Hz instead of 304Hz.
I'm still switching between the two, but I think I prefer the Butterworth setup!
Thanks for all the advice again!
Es
I spent yesterday evening and this afternoon messing around with the system.
I've obviously measured the delay of the individual drivers the wrong way last time round... I corrected that, and I now get a marked dip at the crossover frequency when I reverse the polarity of one of two "adjacent" drivers! I also found that the mid-range was the wrong polarity 😱
The whole system sounds much more dynamic now 😉
I also tried a setup with 24dB/oct Linkwitz-Riley (as opposed to Butterworth) and a bass-mid crossover frequency of 685Hz instead of 304Hz.
I'm still switching between the two, but I think I prefer the Butterworth setup!
Thanks for all the advice again!
Es