Dayton PS220-8 MLTL Build

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
So I bought these PS220-8s off of a forum member much too long ago and have just now started building a cabinet for them. After much debate, sketching, research, simulations, research, sketching, etc - I decided on a MLTL.

With some help from Martin J. King's MathCad worksheets I came up with the following:

13071116773_35a0044052_z.jpg

46.5" interior height, 2 cuft volume (~56.5L), driver about 6 inches down, port about 6" up, 3" dia/2" long port.

Initial sketches came up with this:

13071204264_b8188a8fea_z.jpg


I figured the shape was do able... using sonotubes :) I had no intention of kerfing MDF or ply, although I'm sure it would have saved my some headache later.

The initial prototype came out looking alright and couldn't help myself -painters tape is definitely NOT the best way to hold a driver.

13070696703_62781d5e96_z.jpg


Initial impressions - super shouty! Pretty much unbearable to listen to. Just for kicks, I took a quick impulse measurement:

13070638105_3002cfcb69_z.jpg


After putting the last of my on hand stuffing I got this (ignore the SPL, I accidentally messed with various volumes in between measurements):

13070961744_d37a7d4746_z.jpg


Much better, but definitely still lacking in the bass department. Notice, this was without any filtering at all, no BSC, no notch, etc.

After running some calculations for a BSC, I came up with some numbers that I had some parts for - 3.5mH, 8.2Ohms. This really brought the bass performance up a bit and helped level the top end out quite a bit. I feel that I still need a bit deeper BSC circuit. I'm thinking 4.36mH with ~10Ohms may do it, but sadly I do not have the parts on hand currently.

Of course - I haven't accomplished another measurement yet. More work needed to be done. The sides were just one layer of sonotube and two layers of asphalt felt for damping. The felt did a pretty good job, but I decided to throw on two layers of fiberglass over the top.

13070695423_2f8416b55b_z.jpg


Man I hate fiberglass!! But the result was exactly what I desired - increased wall strength. The knock test is pretty good now. After hitting the high spots with the orbital, I added another layer of the asphalt felt to give me some more damping and a smooth surface to work with, as these would end up getting wrapped in some pleather.

During our run to the store today (JoAnn's and Hancock Fabrics), we couldn't find any black vinyl that had that subtle leather feeling to it. We found a few darker browns, however just not what thought would look nice. Well, except for one :)


13070703533_fa36665165_z.jpg


That's right - faux alligator :) My wife was a little iffy about my choice at first, however after wrapping the "thing" she was in love - score!

13070702033_a353e93aa1_z.jpg


13070698283_db81e15188_z.jpg


There's still a little work to be done finishing the speaker, mainly top and bottom plates (1" ball bearings for "spikes"), but for now I am enjoying the one in mono. After adding a bit more stuffing (picked up a few days before), solidly mounting the Dayton to the baffle, and adding a +4 bass boost on the receiver I am almost completely happy :)

Ben K.
 
Absolutely. In fact, I already had - multiple times. I don't think the filter network for the Singularities will do it for me, just personal taste. But I may give it a try.

EDIT: The biggest difference between the Singularities and mine is the interior volume. Mine is about 40% of Curt's build. That may have quite a bit to do with what I'm hearing/not hearing.
 
Got a few more measurements tonight after dinner. In all cases, the bass boost on the receiver was set to +4 and the 3.5mH/8.2Ohm filter was in place. Pay no attention to the actual SPL levels as again I adjusted volume between tests - the high-end of the driver overpowered the mic after I had already completed the port measurements and didn't want to redo them.

Port output @1in, impulse measurement:
13095364603_826351cfdd_z.jpg


Port output @1in, spectrum analyzer:
13095364403_916f1e3e6c_z.jpg


Driver output @1ft, impulse measurement:
13095539734_bde03036e3_z.jpg


I tried a much closer measurement of the driver, but saw a huge dip around 5kHz which went away with an increase in mic->driver distance.

The speaker actually measured much flatter than I thought it would, including the up tilt in the bottom octaves. I think my ears are used to much more bass output from the 21" OB woofers...

I may still play around with the filter some, including maybe a slight notch at around 3.5kHz and seeing if anything can be done about the output above 10kHz - but still pretty happy for now.

Also: Taking away the +4 boost, lowers the output below ~250-300Hz by a pretty accurate 4dB - still a bit above the remainder of the range.

Ben K.
 
Finalizing

Sorry it's taken so long folks.

I got very acquainted with Boxsim about a week ago and decided to throw the Dayton's through the program to see what I could come up with. I padded the top end down, brought down the peak at around 3.7k, and took the baffle step down quite a bit - maybe a bit too much, but nothing I can't play with.

I built the circuit today and must say that I really like what I hear. Obviously much efficiency was lost, but as it was all in the top end, I feel that they were never that efficient to begin with. They have very adequate bass response now and they still have that little bit of sparkle at the top end. The mids are much improved as well and not as drowned out.

I'm a happy camper ;)
 

Attachments

  • Crossover Design (Boxsim).JPG
    Crossover Design (Boxsim).JPG
    26 KB · Views: 460
  • Simulated Response.JPG
    Simulated Response.JPG
    155.4 KB · Views: 485
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.