Is there any 100% compatible transceivers to thisone?
It is inside a DAC and i want to upgrade it.
Any good suggest
ManUtd.
It is inside a DAC and i want to upgrade it.
Any good suggest
ManUtd.
What is your intention?
Upgrading sound quality? Then a change of the receiver chip alone won't help. Changing the frontend to a ASRC fed from a local low-jitter clock can improve things as well as reclocking near the DAC chips.
If all you need is 96/24 compatibility, the CS8414 will work as a pin-compatible replacement, and, depending on the application (schematic?), if you're lucky you won't have to modify anything else.
Upgrading sound quality? Then a change of the receiver chip alone won't help. Changing the frontend to a ASRC fed from a local low-jitter clock can improve things as well as reclocking near the DAC chips.
If all you need is 96/24 compatibility, the CS8414 will work as a pin-compatible replacement, and, depending on the application (schematic?), if you're lucky you won't have to modify anything else.
8412 and 8414 isn't 100% compatible, the LED's are changed (maybe something else) but otherwise it's similar.
If you mainly have 44.1/16 signals this change to 8414 won't be a big upgrade.
If you mainly have 44.1/16 signals this change to 8414 won't be a big upgrade.
AMT-freak said:What is your intention?
Upgrading sound quality? Then a change of the receiver chip alone won't help. Changing the frontend to a ASRC fed from a local low-jitter clock can improve things as well as reclocking near the DAC chips.
If all you need is 96/24 compatibility, the CS8414 will work as a pin-compatible replacement, and, depending on the application (schematic?), if you're lucky you won't have to modify anything else.
My intension is only to replace a CS8412 inside a DAC,but i can not find a 8412 at Crystal Inc only 8414.
ManUtd.
Which reciever do you have right now?ManUtd said:
My intension is only to replace a CS8412 inside a DAC,but i can not find a 8412 at Crystal Inc only 8414.
peranders said:
Which reciever do you have right now?
I have CS8412 inside a DAC from AudioSynthesis called DSM.
They main difference between the recievers is that the 8414 can take 96 kSp so if you don't have any 96 kSp material this won't be a great upgrade.
peranders said:They main difference between the recievers is that the 8414 can take 96 kSp so if you don't have any 96 kSp material this won't be a great upgrade.
Only reason for this change is i can`t find any CS8412.
ManUtd
What do you mean manutd, upgrade with the same chip doesn't result anything, if you wanna make difference try give that chip a better power supply and wanna make a little extereme, power your DAC with battery, make a big leap change.😱
A'af said:What do you mean manutd, upgrade with the same chip doesn't result anything, if you wanna make difference try give that chip a better power supply and wanna make a little extereme, power your DAC with battery, make a big leap change.😱
Reason why i say "upgrade" is because CS8412 is defective
and then i thought it could be upgraded at same time.
ManUtd.
The CS8412 is ok...
But if you want to "upgrade"/tweak; a separate psu, and a modified loopfilter may help.
(Search 8412 + loopfilter...)
Arne K
But if you want to "upgrade"/tweak; a separate psu, and a modified loopfilter may help.
(Search 8412 + loopfilter...)
Arne K
AMT-freak said:I can supply CS8412 if you need one. Send me email. Those chips aren't exactly cheap, though.
Thanks,but i can have some here and they cost approx. 12£
ManUtd.
16.20€ + shipping.
I'm just processing a group buy and shipping parts this week anyway, so if you send me your address, I can ship this week.
I'm just processing a group buy and shipping parts this week anyway, so if you send me your address, I can ship this week.
Which type of cap for 8412 loopfilter
I have been looking at the loopfilter of the CS8412- Currently I am using the Wildmonkeysects arrangement- 3300pF between filt and Agnd, 220nF and 470R in parallel to the 3300pF cap.
I am using polyesters in my lash-up, but wonder if I could do better...
My problem is finding suitable small quality capacitors in these sizes:
Ceramic- Small but microphonic?
Polypropylene- too big, hence too inductive?
Polyester - too lossy at?
Which do I choose?
I have been looking at the loopfilter of the CS8412- Currently I am using the Wildmonkeysects arrangement- 3300pF between filt and Agnd, 220nF and 470R in parallel to the 3300pF cap.
I am using polyesters in my lash-up, but wonder if I could do better...
My problem is finding suitable small quality capacitors in these sizes:
Ceramic- Small but microphonic?
Polypropylene- too big, hence too inductive?
Polyester - too lossy at?
Which do I choose?
220 nF MKT ( polyester ) for size reasons and because they suffice and the 3.3 nF polystyrene ( tad too big ) or MKT ( for size again ). MKP's are too big to use here ( too long wires ).
Excellent- Just the sort of reply I wanted - Cheers
Excellent- Just the sort of reply I wanted - Cheers
How about this one for the 220nF polyester:
Wima MKS 02
And for the 3300pF...
LCR EXFS
Seem appropriate?
P.S. I thought polystyrenes weren't great at r.f. Did I think wrong?
Excellent- Just the sort of reply I wanted - Cheers
How about this one for the 220nF polyester:
Wima MKS 02
And for the 3300pF...
LCR EXFS
Seem appropriate?
P.S. I thought polystyrenes weren't great at r.f. Did I think wrong?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- Cs8412