Crossover FAST/WAW Alpair 7ms and Peerless 830869

At t-linespeakers.org the PLLXO calculator is showing capacitor values in nano-farad andwhen converting it to micro-farad the values becoming so small and not available in commercial sites.
Is the worksheet updated and what to do in case the required micro- farad value is too small and not available??
 
I was using the link in the t-linespeaker.org site to calculate component values for a PLLXO. My target is 300 hz for a 1 st order high pass and low pass. My question is to get a flat frequency response and to avoid a bump at the crossover point, do I need to choose different low pass ( e.g. 220 hz) and high pass (e.g. 314 hz ) crossover calculation or it is already factored in the calculation formula provided in site mentioned?
 
Can you be more precise please? If i choose a 300hz crossover point, should i put 300 hz in the calculation pf both low pass and high pass filter? If not then what should be the ideal frequencies in low pass and high pass section in order to get a crossover point of 300 hz and also a almost flat frequency response?
 
Your crossover point is uncertain at this point.

The Peerless looks easy to deal with.

The Alpair has a 3dB/octave rise below 300Hz which will confound your attempt to bring it down first order. There may be a baffle related rise above 300Hz as well.

One possible method of dealing with both of these is to use a higher Q second order filter. At line level you could use an inductor, or you could bring the highs down with an RC.

Do you use equalisation?
 
I have an idea. Maybe the best way to answer this is to ask someone who has worked with this driver. Because your speaker will be a (FAST/WAW) how would you feel about moving this question to the full-range forum?
 
Hello,
This is what the French did some decades ago. It is kind of copied from American audio magazine dating from the sixties. Where they used peerless? adjustable coils. It was also described in Sound Practices magazine.
greetings, eduard
 

Attachments

  • Filtrage%252520Multi-amplification-1.png
    Filtrage%252520Multi-amplification-1.png
    29.6 KB · Views: 167