Cone tweeters

Status
Not open for further replies.
It also shows a FEM prediction of 1.9T in the gap.
I only see about 1.1T in the gap (figure 6 on page 4). That ties in with my own experience playing with FEMM - it's a struggle to get more than about 1T with any practical geometry.
OTOH, I have seen a driver claiming 2T in the gap. I'd love to know how they achieved that (if it's true).

A recent design by another Member claimed that using a neo magnet in the pole could not get above ~0.5T.
Deserves a "could try harder" on his report card.😛
 
I like cone tweeters a great deal. On theoretical grounds, at high frequency, say above 7kHz, soft domes leave the centre resonance undefined. Hence they sound spitty and harsh. Whatever HF output they have is certainly not music to my ears. 😡

Cone tweeters perhaps work much better, giving ring radiators (which pin the centre) a run for their money.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

TW 70 - 8 Ohm

This cheapie Monacor HT22/8 has a metal centre dome so plays nicely at HF:
HT-22/8

The classic peerless polycone tweeter may be reproduced by the Monacor SPP-90 here: SPP-90

I would like to try that one. It will control the usual 14kHz resonance better, by way of better damping and hence reduced radiating area. 😎

BTW, third order 3.5kHz filters work best with cone tweeters IMO. Forget the usual first order single cap approach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.