Cloth Ears,
I am leaning towards the Fig 2 system, sealed, as that would give me the smallest box, and I do not fancy one of the motors projecting out of the box.
I would love to be able to do a system that is not isobaric and that is push/pull, but box size (WAF) is a problem, and what about the issue of getting garbage into the motor system when having one motor facing out of the box?
Size wise, I can get away with either 15" in isobaric setting, or multiple 12"s, but I am afraid the box cannot be larger than approx. 80 liters. I will have two boxes, no more, no less.
Any suggestions that will better an isobaric system using two 15" with the constrains above? Quality is important, not SPL.
I am leaning towards the Fig 2 system, sealed, as that would give me the smallest box, and I do not fancy one of the motors projecting out of the box.
I would love to be able to do a system that is not isobaric and that is push/pull, but box size (WAF) is a problem, and what about the issue of getting garbage into the motor system when having one motor facing out of the box?
Size wise, I can get away with either 15" in isobaric setting, or multiple 12"s, but I am afraid the box cannot be larger than approx. 80 liters. I will have two boxes, no more, no less.
Any suggestions that will better an isobaric system using two 15" with the constrains above? Quality is important, not SPL.