This paper has already been discussed here (don't remember what thread). The most interesting part is the dead-time control IMO.
Regards
Charles
Regards
Charles
phase_accurate said:This paper has already been discussed here (don't remember what thread). The most interesting part is the dead-time control IMO.
Regards
Charles
Seems to prove what I've read about about diminished returns in this type of more complex dead time control system. Distortion still skyrockets with power.
It's a shame they didn't go a step further with it so we could see the overlay.
Regards,
Chris
There's also this:
http://www.freshpatents.com/Power-amplifier-end-stage-dt20051006ptan20050218988.php
I can get "minimal deadtime" out of the abstract paper.... but
"The invention provides an end stage in which the dead time can be omitted"
Objective failed?
Do you have a link or a copy of the AES paper? I'm not a member.
http://www.freshpatents.com/Power-amplifier-end-stage-dt20051006ptan20050218988.php
I can get "minimal deadtime" out of the abstract paper.... but
"The invention provides an end stage in which the dead time can be omitted"
Objective failed?
Do you have a link or a copy of the AES paper? I'm not a member.
If you want some state of the art dead time control, you can also try to find some info/reverse engineering about the TACT Milenium
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Class D
- Class D from Philips