S sreten R.I.P. Joined 2003 2008-08-18 4:18 pm #101 2008-08-18 4:18 pm #101 Daveis said: What DID make it better was upgrading the tweeter to a better model. Click to expand... Hi, and somewhat cheaper than a power amplifier + active c/o, 🙂/sreten. T thoriated Member Joined 2003 2008-08-18 5:50 pm #102 2008-08-18 5:50 pm #102 For me, the main problem with passive (for an upper midrange or treble crossover) is the difficulty of implementing delay. Click to expand... I agree with you when the delay to be corrected is more than a millisecond or two (for HF). Prev 1 … Go to page Go 4 5 6 First Prev 6 of 6 Go to page Go Status Not open for further replies.
Daveis said: What DID make it better was upgrading the tweeter to a better model. Click to expand... Hi, and somewhat cheaper than a power amplifier + active c/o, 🙂/sreten.
T thoriated Member Joined 2003 2008-08-18 5:50 pm #102 2008-08-18 5:50 pm #102 For me, the main problem with passive (for an upper midrange or treble crossover) is the difficulty of implementing delay. Click to expand... I agree with you when the delay to be corrected is more than a millisecond or two (for HF).
For me, the main problem with passive (for an upper midrange or treble crossover) is the difficulty of implementing delay. Click to expand... I agree with you when the delay to be corrected is more than a millisecond or two (for HF).
