• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

CCS IXTP08N100D2 sounds better than DN2540

I have built two of the same amp (for different rooms...). both the same output tx, both reg salas hv PS.... they are the same.

They sound identical, there is no way i could tell a difference.

So, i decided to play with CCS fets (cascode and not). My ears are ok, but nothing special.

In short, DN2540 and IXTP08N100D2 impart a sound signature that you can hear relatively easily.... the IXTP08N100D2 is better, more open, more space (which in my opinion is just better treble at the top end).

Edit -

Also, sic diode bias sound better than blue led.
 
gain? that was my first thought. Scope says not.

and this does pain me slightly as it sounds a bit snake oil right? the engineer in me doesnt like it. In cascode, impendance differences must be vanishingly small...

Currently the test setup looks like this:
 
Last edited:
From audioasylum : John, you really should try the IXYS version. They eliminate the veiling heard in the Supertex depletion-mode mosfets, and they have increased dynamics as well. I have used both mosfets in the earlier and most recent version of the K&K cascode CCS kit (on plate and cathode tail applications). They are simple to adjust with a variable resistor and sound really excellent
 
I extracted a chart from the link adamus provided. FWIW, I find it interesting that a favorite FET of mine, the IRFBC20, exhibits smaller capacitances than the IRF820. The 'BC20 is a "successor" to the '820.
 

Attachments

  • CCS FET Capacitance Chart.JPG
    CCS FET Capacitance Chart.JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 543
  • Like
Reactions: DrowningNotWaving
Is the output of this salas hv regulator free from suspicion?

yeah, no issue, and both set to be the same. honestly, the amps are identical.

to be super clear, the dn2540 sounds fantastic. with a d3a or 6e6p, we are talking a seriously lovely sound, zero audible noise etc.

The IXTP sounds fantastic, but slightly different, just a bit more forward. The bits that making me hesitate is the gain question.... is it just slightly high gain (which in my experience leads to the sorts of comments like 'greater impact, more dynamic').
 
Comments like 'greater impact, more dynamic' tends to suspicion of 3d harmonic. Measurements should reveal. Do not get me wrong, I am not equipped with fine measurement instruments either. I am using dn2540 (not stacked) for G2 regulation and wonder if it has impact on reproduction quality which i found 'a little dark'.
 
Last edited:
If you could share your schematic, we could know what function this part is responsible for in your amp. The IXT part conducts about 10x the current so you need a bigger source resistor value. From the IXT data sheet that part will require more than -2V, maybe -3V to keep it down to 40mA. So the Source resistor would be about 3V/0.04A=75 Ohms. This is down in the bottom of the graph so it's just an estimate, and parts vary a lot.